Sickness is a serious social danger that impacts the livelihoods of individuals, including with the ability to earn an income as well as depriving families of stable lives and causing pain in the body. To prevent this, the ILO provided specific criteria for the sickness benefit system in the conventions and recommendation. Most OECD countries have adopted the sickness benefit schemes, but our society is not yet introducing it. As a model, the main contents of the sickness benefit system in France and Sweden are as follows. In France, health insurance is responsible for sickness benefits. As a qualification, it confirms the contributions to health insurance along with the length of employment. It has special exceptions for long-term illnesses and admits overlapping benefits with other social security benefits. Furthermore, the company dispends the employee supplementary benefits to take care of income other than sickness benefits. In Sweden, the sickness benefit is paid according to the degree of loss of labor capacity and not unemployment. Parental-leave benefit is added to the sickness benefit for childcare. A dedicated manager exists to assist ill employees, and the company helps them quickly by giving them the sickness pay which saves on finances prior to the social insurance’s sickness benefit. In comparison, the legislation bills proposed in the past have been to establish a paid sick leave in the Labor Standards Act or to create ickness benefit in the employment insurance. However, the former has the disadvantage that it does not cope with long-term disease; the latter does not include the self-employed. Therefore, this paper proposes health insurance as the sickness benefit system to cover all people and suggests that anyone who contributes to health insurance is paid by the sickness benefit not according to the length of employment such as the employment insurance. The benefits duration is 6 months and can be received up to 1 year. Benefits are 50% of ordinary wages, but increase with the number of dependents.
목차
Ⅰ. 상병급여제도의 필요성 Ⅱ. ILO의 상병급여제도 내용 Ⅲ. 프랑스의 상병급여제도 내용 Ⅳ. 스웨덴의 상병급여제도 내용 Ⅴ. 상병급여제도의 도입방안 Ⅵ. 결론 참고문헌
키워드
상병급여유급병가프랑스 상병급여제도스웨덴 상병급여제도국민건강보험sickness benefitsickness paysickness benefit in Francesickness benefit in Swedennational health insurance
한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
설립연도
1997
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다.
학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.