Dong-Myung Lee, Binh Do Cong, Jun-Ho Lee, In-Young Yeo, Cheol-Su Kim
언어
영어(ENG)
URL
https://www.earticle.net/Article/A356537
원문정보
초록
영어
Background: It is very difficult to distinguish between a radioactive contamination source and background radiation from natural radionuclides in the marine environment by means of online monitoring system. The objective of this study was to investigate a statistical process for triggering abnormal level of count rate data measured from our on-line seawater radioactivity monitoring. Materials and Methods: Count rate data sets in time series were collected from 9 monitoring posts. All of the count rate data were measured every 15 minutes from the region of interest (ROI) for 137Cs (Eγ = 661.6 keV) on the gamma-ray energy spectrum. The Shewhart (3σ), CUSUM, and Bayesian S-R control chart methods were evaluated and the comparative analysis of determination methods for count rate data was carried out in terms of the false positive incidence rate. All statistical algorithms were developed using R Programming by the authors. Results and Discussion: The 3σ, CUSUM, and S-R analyses resulted in the average false positive incidence rate of 0.164 ±0.047%, 0.064 ±0.0367%, and 0.030 ±0.018%, respectively. The S-R method has a lower value than that of the 3σ and CUSUM method, because the Bayesian S-R method use the information to evaluate a posterior distribution, even though the CUSUM control chart accumulate information from recent data points. As the result of comparison between net count rate and gross count rate measured in time series all the year at a monitoring post using the 3σ control charts, the two methods resulted in the false positive incidence rate of 0.142% and 0.219%, respectively. Conclusion: Bayesian S-R and CUSUM control charts are better suited for on-line seawater radioactivity monitoring with an count rate data in time series than 3σ control chart. However, it requires a continuous increasing trend to differentiate between a false positive and actual radioactive contamination. For the determination of count rate, the net count method is better than the gross count method because of relatively a small variation in the data points.
목차
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Materials and Methods 1. Count rate data for statistical analysis 2. Statistical control charts Results and Discussion 1. Comparison of control chart methods 2. Net count rate and gross count rate Conclusion References
키워드
Shewhart Control Chart (3σ)Cumulative Sum (CUSUM)Bayesian Shiryaev- Roberts (S-R) ProcedureOn-Line Seawater MonitoringFalse Positive Incidence RateGamma Energy Spectrum
저자
Dong-Myung Lee [ Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon, Korea ]
Corresponding Author
Binh Do Cong [ Vietnam Agency for Radiation and Nuclear Safety, Ha Noi, Vietnam ]
Jun-Ho Lee [ University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea ]
In-Young Yeo [ Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon, Korea ]
Cheol-Su Kim [ Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon, Korea ]
대한방사선방어학회 [Korean Association For Radiation Protection]
설립연도
1975
분야
자연과학>기타자연과학
소개
회원 상호간의 협조와 친목을 도모함으로써 방사선방어에 관한 제반연구 및 발전에 이바지함을 물론 학술의 국제교류 및 국제학술단체와의 상호협력 증진에 기여함을 목적으로 하며, 이 목적을 달성하기 위하여 다음 각 호의 사업을 한다.
1. 방사선방어에 관한 학술연구발표회 및 강연회 등의 개최
2. 학회지 및 방사선방어에 관한 학술간행물의 발행 및 배포
3. 방사선방어에 관한 학술의 국제교류 및 협력
4. 방사선방어에 관한 국제학술자료의 조사, 수집 및 번역
5. 방사선방어에 관한 조사 및 연구용역
6. 회원의 연구활동을 위한 제반협조
7. 기타 본 학회의 목적 달성에 필요한 사항
간행물
간행물명
방사선방어학회지 [Journal of Radiation Protection and Research]