Chaemin Im, Mincheol Cho, Jeseok Bang, Jaemin Kim, Seungyong Hahn
언어
영어(ENG)
URL
https://www.earticle.net/Article/A355175
※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.
※ 학술발표대회집, 워크숍 자료집 중 4페이지 이내 논문은 '요약'만 제공되는 경우가 있으니, 구매 전에 간행물명, 페이지 수 확인 부탁 드립니다.
4,000원
원문정보
초록
영어
The lumped-parameter circuit model for a no- insulation (NI) high temperature superconductor (HTS) magnet has been well understood after many experimental and analytic studies over a decade. It successfully explains the non-linear charging behaviors of NI magnets. Yet, recently, multiple groups reported that the post-quench electromechanical behaviors of an NI HTS magnet may not be well explained by the lumped circuit model. The characteristic resistance of an NI magnet is one of the key parameters to characterize the so-called “NI behaviors” of an NI magnet and recently a few groups reported a potential that the characteristic resistance of an NI magnet may substantially vary during a quench. This paper deals with this issue, the increment of contact resistance of the no-insulation (NI) REBCO magnet during a quench and its impact on the post-quench behaviors. A 7 T 78 mm NI REBCO magnet that was previously built by the MIT Francis Bitter Magnet Laboratory was chosen for our simulation to investigate the increment of contact resistance to better duplicate the post-quench coil voltages in the simulation. The simulation results showed that using the contact resistance value measured in the liquid nitrogen test, the magnitude of the current through the coil must be much greater than the critical current. This indicates that the value of the contact resistance should increase sharply after the quench occurs, depending on the lumped circuit model.
목차
Abstract 1. INTRODUCTION 2. 7 T 78 MM MAGNET CONFIGURATION AND PARAMETERS 2.1. Parameters of the REBCO conductor 2.2. Parameters of the Magnet 3. SIMULATION RESULTS & DISCUSSION 3.1. Key Equations: KVL and KCL 3.2. Coil Voltage: Interpolated by Hermite method 3.3. Azimuthal & Radial Current Simulation: by Adopting Measured Characteristic Resistance Value 3.4. Azimuthal Current Simulation: by Adopting Increased Characteristic Resistance Value 4. CONCLUSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT REFERENCES