Earticle

초록

영어

An online survey dealing with the purchase of potentially risky consumer products,genetically modified foods (n=379), examined behavioral intention within the framework of the theory of reasoned action (Fishbein & Ajzen, 2010). In addition to attitude and social norms, which are subsumed under the theory, predictors examined included cognitive and affective risk perceptions, systematic versus heuristic processing, and two personality traits: need for cognition and need for affect (specifically, the avoidance and approach sub-dimensions identified by Maio & Esses, 2001). Four hypotheses were tested and supported. High cognitive and affective risk perceptions were negatively related to attitude, adherence to social norms and purchase intent. High need for cognition was positively related to systematic processing, while negatively related to heuristic processing. High need for affect avoidance was positively related to heuristic processing, while high need for affect approach was positively related to systematic processing. Finally, higher systematic processing was positively related to both cognitive risk perception and affective risk perception, while higher heuristic processing was not. Awareness was included as a possible explanatory variable that helped explain purchase intent. In order to investigate the relationships between the key variables more closely, hierarchical regression analyses examined the combined effects of the focal and explanatory variable on purchase intent. The final regression model in the study, which explained 29.2% of the variance, suggested that purchase intention was best explained by the need for affect avoidance, low affective risk perceptions, positive attitude, and conformity to social norms. This study proposed a framework in which personality traits based on psychological needs (need for cognition and need for affect) led to different styles of processing. Then, two forms of risk perception (cognitive and affective) together were shown to influence purchase intention ofcommon technologically enhanced consumer goods. The study underscored the importance of looking into both affective and cognitive risk perceptions examining purchase intention for risky products,genetically modified organisms (GMO) foods. This study also illustrated the potential practical importance of the two sub-dimensions of need for affect identified in the literature, suggesting that each can possibly influence the processing of persuasive messages and risk perceptions and ultimately consumer actions.

목차

INTRODUCTION
LITERATURE REVIEW
Dependent Variable: Purchase Intention
Possible Explanatory Variable
Hypotheses
METHODS
Data Analysis
RESULTS
Hypotheses Test Results
Secondary Analyses of Combined Effects of Variables
Procedures
DISCUSSION
Implications for Theory
Strengths and Limitations of Study
Future Research
REFERENCES

키워드

저자

• 한국PR학회

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  AJPR [Asian Journal of Public Relations]

• 간기

  연간

• eISSN

  2568-2812

• 수록기간

  2017~2023

• 십진분류

  KDC 326 DDC 338