Earticle

초록

영어

The debates continue on the conceptualization of Southeast Asia and the ways in which those of us who are concerned to attempt scholarly interventions in the region define, conceive, understand and engage with it. But, in an important sense, the region has now been defined for us by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and whatever academic researchers might wish to impose on Southeast Asia in regard to their priorities and interests, it may make little difference. Given the politically-derived, nation-state definition of Southeast Asia, are all our problems of regional definition resolved? In some respects, they have been. ASEAN has constructed and institutionalized a regional organization and an associated regional culture. But in certain fields of research we still require academic flexibility. We cannot always be confined by an ASEANderived regional definition. The paper will explore other configurations of ‘region’ and its sub-divisions and propose, that in the spirit of academic freedom, we can continue to generate imaginative depictions of Southeast Asia and its constituents both within and beyond the region.

목차

[ Abstract ]
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Is there a way forward?
Ⅲ. ASEAN: the way forward?
Ⅳ. ASEAN institutionalization: tourism as a case
Ⅴ. Culture and identity
Ⅵ. Contraction, expansion, borders and boundaries
Ⅶ. The return to the “old” Southeast Asia
Ⅷ. Conclusions
References

키워드

저자

• Victor T. King [ Professor of Borneo Studies, Institute of Asian Studies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Emeritus Professor of South East Asian Studies, University of Leeds. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  수완나부미 [Suvannabhumi]

• 간기

  반년간

• pISSN

  2092-738X

• 수록기간

  ~2020

• 십진분류

  KDC 309 DDC 306