In January 2018, Philip Roth said about the #MeToo movement in an interview with The New York Times, “none of the more extreme conduct I have been reading about in the newspapers lately has astonished me” (McGrath). At the height of the #MeToo movement, which had indicted media and business tycoons, as well as political leaders, Roth said that his lifelong novelistic concern in “depicting these men each as he is, each as he behaves, aroused, stimulated, hungry in the grip of carnal fervor” had meant that he had confronted the “hard facts” of such male lustful drives (McGrath). This paper rereads The Human Stain, in which Roth criticizes the effects of political correctness in the enclosed institution of academia, to comment on the perspective of human existence as “inevitably stained” (Roth 242). In rereading the tragic dimensions of the novel, this paper seeks to grapple with the effects of political correctness and the limitations of public opinion (represented through the academic institution, including the flawed feminist scholar Delphine Roux) on the lives of characters like Coleman Silk and Faunia Farley.
목차
I. Introduction: The #MeToo Movement in 2018 II. Delphine Roux as the Voice of Political Correctness III. How Misogynistic is The Human Stain? IV. Faunia Farley and the Limitations of Political Correctness V. Conclusion Works Cited Abstract
키워드
The Human StainPhilip RothMeToopolitical correctnesspublic opinion20C American novel
저자
Sarah Yoon [ Yonsei University, Graduate Student ]