Mohammad Mahfujur Rahman, Chan Hyeong Kim, Seonghoon Kim
언어
영어(ENG)
URL
https://www.earticle.net/Article/A350081
원문정보
초록
영어
Background: There have been much efforts to develop the proper and realistic machine Quality Assurance (QA) reflecting on real Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plan. In this work we propose and test a special VMAT plan of plan-class specific (pcsr) QA, as a machine QA so that it might be a good solution to supplement weak point of present machine QA to make it more realistic for VMAT treatment. Materials and Methods: We divided human body into 5 treatment sites: brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. One plan for each treatment site was selected from real VMAT cases and contours were mapped into the computational human phantom where the same plan as real VMAT plan was created and called plan-class specific reference (pcsr) QA plan. We delivered this pcsr QA plan on a daily basis over the full research period and tracked how much MLC movement and dosimetric error occurred in regular delivery. Several real patients under treatments were also tracked to test the usefulness of pcsr QA through comparisons between them. We used dynalog file viewer (DFV) and Dynalog file to analyze position and speed of individual MLC leaf. The gamma pass rate from portal dosimetry for different gamma criteria was analyzed to evaluate analyze dosimetric accuracy. Results and Discussion: The maxRMS of MLC position error for all plans were all within the tolerance limit of < 0.35 cm and the positional variation of maxPEs for both pcsr and real plans were observed very stable over the research session. Daily variations of maxRMS of MLC speed error and gamma pass rate for real VMAT plans were observed very comparable to those in their pcsr plans in good acceptable fluctuation. Conclusion: We believe that the newly proposed pcsr QA would be useful and helpful to predict the mid-term quality of real VMAT treatment delivery.
목차
ABSTRACT Introduction Materials and Methods 1. Plan classification 2. Creating pcsr QA plan Results and Discussion 1. MLC movement analysis 2. Dosimetric analysis CONCLUSION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT REFERENCES
키워드
VMATQuality AssurancePlan-class specific referenceGamma pass rateMaxRMS
저자
Mohammad Mahfujur Rahman [ Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea ]
Chan Hyeong Kim [ Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea ]
Seonghoon Kim [ Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University Medical Center, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea ]
Corresponding Author
대한방사선방어학회 [Korean Association For Radiation Protection]
설립연도
1975
분야
자연과학>기타자연과학
소개
회원 상호간의 협조와 친목을 도모함으로써 방사선방어에 관한 제반연구 및 발전에 이바지함을 물론 학술의 국제교류 및 국제학술단체와의 상호협력 증진에 기여함을 목적으로 하며, 이 목적을 달성하기 위하여 다음 각 호의 사업을 한다.
1. 방사선방어에 관한 학술연구발표회 및 강연회 등의 개최
2. 학회지 및 방사선방어에 관한 학술간행물의 발행 및 배포
3. 방사선방어에 관한 학술의 국제교류 및 협력
4. 방사선방어에 관한 국제학술자료의 조사, 수집 및 번역
5. 방사선방어에 관한 조사 및 연구용역
6. 회원의 연구활동을 위한 제반협조
7. 기타 본 학회의 목적 달성에 필요한 사항
간행물
간행물명
방사선방어학회지 [Journal of Radiation Protection and Research]