The workinghourssystem in labourlaw shows that if the intensity, risk, and burden of work are made in the form of work atmosphere or atmospheric work, unlike ordinary work, the regulation of labor law should be differentiated in terms of health rights . It is worth noting this. Our case is different. Regardless of the intensity of the work, only the working time is divided by the break time. The familial involvement in this biased system, too, is considered to be a complete working time, though it will depend on specific cases. Strictly speaking, as in Germany, the forms of atmospheric work, the working atmosphere and call work are judged differently by law, given the intensity of the work being affected by the worker's health. For example, 8 hours of actual working hours and 8 hours of working hours can not be equally regulated for workers' health rights. Here is the reason why Germany can relax the limitations of overtime work on the form of atmospheric work, and calculate and pay less wages than normal work wages. Regrettably, regulations on working hours in the current Labor Standards Act of Korea are too uniform. Unless the conceptual pluralism of working time is taken into consideration, it can not be reasonably responded to the reality of labor. Furthermore, the legislative imperfections in the gray zone of various working hours such as business trips and occupations can not be left unchanged. Spatial restraint and temporal restraint are the most typical signs of dependent labor. Working hours are considered to be the most disciplined areas that will undergo the greatest changes in terms of labor market flexibility. This does not just mean the need for management needs or economic volatility. This is in line with the individual needs of workers. It is necessary for the labor and management to construct a working time model that is most effective in terms of working time and reflects the needs of the workers.
목차
I. 서설 II. 노동법 상 근로시간의 개념과기능적 의의 III. 근로시간의 해당 여부에 대한 사법적 판단의 모호성과 '회색지대' IV. 근로시간 개념의 다원성-' 독일의입법례를 중심으로' V. 결론 참고문헌
한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
설립연도
1997
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다.
학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.