Earticle

초록

영어

The Joint Peal Provision carries a penalty not only the firsthand violator but also all the secondhand parties concerned, a person or company. Under article 6 of Constitutional Court's the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Health Offenses, there is a condicthion between the deserved punishment to an secondhand person and the Criminal Law's the Principle of Strict Liability. Accordingly, The Joint Peal Provision, the article 50 under the Licensed Real Estate Law; this Article apply to the estate agent performing under the continuous supervision against a breach, was reformed and has the conditional article which gives an acquittal to the deserved secondhand parties under article the Cause of Exemption from Responsibility. This Article critically reviews the meanings of the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act Article 50 and discover a number of the problems penetratively by the legal interpretation.

목차

< Abstract >
 Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
 Ⅱ. 양벌규정의 위헌성
  1. 헌법재판소의 입장
  2. 대법원의 입장
 Ⅲ. 공인중개사법상 양벌규정
  1. 영업주인 중개업자(법인 또는 개인)의 처벌근거
  2. 면책사유인 “상당한 주의와 감독”의 해석
  3. 법인과 개인으로 양벌규정을 구분할 필요는 없는가?
  4. 형사책임원칙과 관련한 몇 가지 문제점
 Ⅳ. 행정상 제재근거로서의 양벌규정
  1. 판례의 입장
  2. 행정상 제재근거로서의 타당성 여부
 Ⅴ. 맺음말
 〈참고문헌〉

키워드

공인중개사법 행정벌 행정형벌 양벌규정 책임원칙 면책사유 the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act administrative punishment aministrative criminal penalty joint penal provisions the principle of strict liability cause of exemption from responsibility

저자

• 김대명 [ Kim, Dae-Myeong | 대구과학대학교 부동산과 교수, 법학박사 ]
• 이대운 [ Lee, Dae-Woon | 대구과학대학교 부동산과 전임강사 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물