Earticle

초록

영어

The terms such as contradiction, contrary, subcontrary, subaltern, entailment, and so on, are commonly referred as a kind of the labels on opposition by inference in Aristotle’s square of opposition and in modern semantics. But their definitions or applications into referring to the propositional oppositions are often conflicted each other between in Aristotle’s square of opposition and in modern semantics. This paper aims to review what is the definitions of the terms on the oppositions and how to apply the terms to the oppositions in modern semantics and in Aristotle’s immediate inferences. And we try to reveal the reasons that the same terms are used differently in Aristotle’s square of opposition and in modern semantics. As a result, we have found the fact that such terms are differently applied between to Aristotle’s square of opposition and to the modern semantics, because the terms on them have been differently defined with reference to the immediate inference, to the truth conditions, or to the proposition itself.

목차

I. 서론
 II. 대립 사각도에 대한 현대 의미론의 해석
  2.1 대립 사각도와 대립들
  2.2 대립 사각도에서 함축 해석
 III. 아리스토텔레스의 대립 사각도 정의
  3.1 아리스토텔레스의 대립 사각도
  3.2 대립들에 대한 정의
 IV. 명제 대립에 대한 재고
  4.1 모순 대립에 대하여
  4.2 반대 대립에 대하여
  4.3 소반대 대립에 대하여
  4.4 소교체 대립에 대하여
  4.5 함축(implicates)에 대하여
 V. 결론
 Works Cited
 Abstract

키워드

아리스토텔레스의 대립 사각도 직접 추론 현대 의미론 명제 대립 가능 세계 진리 조건 Aristotle’s square of opposition immediate inference modern semantics propositional opposition possible world truth condition

저자

• 윤흥섭 [ Yoon, Heungseob | 충북대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물