현재 위치
Home
硏究論文
산업안전보건법 전부개정안에 대한 비판적 고찰
A Critical Review on the Complete Amendment to Occupational Safety and Health Act
-
- 발행기관
- 한국비교노동법학회 바로가기
-
- 간행물
- 노동법논총 KCI 등재 바로가기
-
- 통권
- 제42집 (2018.04)바로가기
-
- 페이지
- pp.279-320
-
- 저자
-
- 언어
- 한국어(KOR)
-
- URL
- https://www.earticle.net/Article/A328466
※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.
8,800원
원문정보
초록
- 영어
- As a whole, the amendment proposals for the entire legislature are not entirely consistent with systematic and logical coherence, and there are many cases in which the obligation of the employer and the object of the safety and health management are greatly reduced rather than the current law. In addition, there are a few cases that do not conform to the legislative ideology of the occupational safety and health law and the principles of safety and health management. We can not define crimes and punishment as arbitrators, but only criminal acts should be criminal. If a certain act is defined as a crime, there must be reasonable grounds. From this point of view, the revised proposals all extend beyond the scope of the concept and duty of the employer and the contractor, so that they do not take into consideration differences in the nature of labor contracts, contracts and contracts. From another viewpoint, there are many provisions in the revised text that define criminal acts that violate ethics and moral codes or cause harm to others only indirectly without harming others directly. However, criminalization of acts that should be moralized and merely ethically blamed is excessive criminalization. In addition, not all of the contents of the subordinate statute of the amendment have been prescribed in advance, so the law does not regulate concrete contents, and as a result, the people who have the ability to judge the average judge the scope of the act It can not be predicted what kind. In addition, there are few cases that violate the principle of boldness and overbearing as the focus is on expanding the duty of the employer and strengthening punishment. Therefore, if the legislative notice is passed without any amendment, it is expected that it will be involved in the unconstitutional lawsuit as soon as it is enforced and it will continue to be confused for a considerable period of time. And the criminal law has a lot of theoretical problems in the state of the law and the normative force is greatly damaged. As a result, it is feared that the perception that the Industrial Safety and Health Act is a law that can not be practically violated will be widespread throughout society. And the excessive expansion of the scope of the mandate can not only protect the target to be protected but also lead to the weakening of the protection of the core target. In order to avoid problems like this, the entire framework of the amendment should be elaborated again after thorough discussion and examination. In order to do this, it is necessary to have enough opinions and discussions on each side in the attitude that all revisions should be made.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 체계상의 문제점
Ⅲ. 내용상의 문제점
Ⅳ. 현행법보다 후퇴한 부분
Ⅴ. 처벌규정의 문제점
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
키워드
과잉금지의 원칙 규범력 산업안전보건법 안전보건관리 책임주의 principle of prohibition of excess regulatory strength occupational safety and health law safety and health management liability principle저자
간행물 정보
발행기관
-
- 발행기관명
- 한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
- 설립연도
- 1997
- 분야
- 사회과학>법학
- 소개
- 본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다. 학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.
간행물
-
- 간행물명
- 노동법논총 [The Journal of Labor Law]
- 간기
- 연3회
- pISSN
- 1229-4314
- 수록기간
- 1998~2026
- 등재여부
- KCI 등재
- 십진분류
- KDC 336 DDC 363
이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 노동법논총 제42집
피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)
함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.
출처 : 네이버학술정보
0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.