The controversy over rights dispute and interests dispute has lasted for a long time. The recognition that rights dispute is not subject to collective bargaining and strike is widely accepted. However, it is incorrect to judge that it is not included in the object of collective bargaining and strike just because of the matter of rights dispute. Such an interpretation does not match the provision of Article 81-3 of The Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act(TULRAA) of Korea. Article 81-3 of TULRAA provided that the purpose of collective bargaining is “agreement of collective bargaining agreement and other collective bargaining”. Article 81-3 3 of TULRAA clearly show that the right to collective bargaining does not mean that it should be exercised only for the purpose of concluding collective agreement. The most essential purpose of collective bargaining is the determination of union members’ working conditions through the conclusion of collective agreements and the formation of collective autonomy. However, it is also an important objective of collective bargaining to resolve various problems in the process of interpretation and applying collective agreement. As a result, the tension in the process of collective bargaining is relaxed, while on the other hand the concentration of the collective bargaining itself is enhanced, and it is possible to concluded the collective bargaining rather early. The issue other than the purpose of concluding collective agreements can be negotiated on a continuous basis during the valid period of collective bargaining agreement. This will improve the negotiation skills of each party and problem solving skills of autonomy and furthermore it will be a decisive opportunity to secure sustainable stability of labor relations. This is because the basic requirement of the TULRAA is that Labor unions and management voluntarily solve the problems without relying on public institutions. This will be a catalyst to realize the principle of collective autonomy at a higher level with Korean labor-management relations.mean that it should be exercised only for the purpose of concluding collective agreement. The most essential purpose of collective bargaining is the determination of union members’ working conditions through the conclusion of collective agreements and the formation of collective autonomy. However, it is also an important objective of collective bargaining to resolve various problems in the process of interpretation and applying collective agreement.
목차
Ⅰ. 재검토의 배경과 필요성 Ⅱ. 권리분쟁의 개념 Ⅲ. 권리분쟁 사항이 단체교섭 대상에 포함되는지를 둘러싼 논쟁의 원인 Ⅳ. 권리분쟁 사항이 단체교섭 대상에서 제외됨으로 인한 문제점 Ⅴ. 문제 해결을 위한 해석론 Ⅵ. 현실적 유용성 참고문헌
키워드
권리분쟁이익분쟁단체교섭단체교섭 대상노동쟁의의무적 교섭사항임의적 교섭사항기타의 단체교섭Trade Unioncollective bargainingright to collective bargainingthe purpose of collective bargainingrights disputeinterests dispute
저자
이준희 [ Lee Jun Heui | 경총 부설 노동경제연구원 법제연구실 연구위원, 법학박사. ]
한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
설립연도
1997
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다.
학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.