Earticle

초록

영어

Various new measures are being presented to compel a person to perform his/her administrative obligation. Among them, the charge for compelling the performance is the means to compel an obligor to perform his/her obligation for himself/herself by imposing a monetary burden until it is fulfilled. In the sense that the charge for compelling the performance indirectly compels a person who has failed to fulfill his/her obligation to perform it for himself/herself, there exists institutional necessity for it because it can be effective means to ensure the performance of an obligation especially where other compelling measures, such as vicarious execution and direct compulsory performance, are incapacitated. However, there also exists the likelihood of infringement on the obligor's right by repeating the imposition of monetary burden continuously. Therefore, the adequacy of amount of imposition, transparency of imposition process, predictability, and the standardization of process including warning, grant of sufficient time for fulfillment, and provision of an opportunity to submit opinion should be ensured, and the means for rapid remedy of the right should be secured where any wrongful charge for compelling the performance has been imposed. Hence, this paper reviews the changes in the introduction process, legal significance and characteristics of the charge for compelling the performance, and, on the basis of which, proposes issues on and improvement direction of the charge for compelling the performance. It is the fact that with respect to the charge for compelling the performance as means for securing the efficiency of administration, no standardized public law exists, and it is provided for in each respective statute with no coherent system even under the individual law. The charge for compelling the performance which is an unfavorable disposition should be legislatively preceded by systematic and predicable lawful procedures and judicial remedy suggested in the legal principles of the Administrative Procedures Act.

목차

Abstracts
 I. INTRODUCTION
 II . HISTORY OF INTRODUCTION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF CHARGE FOR COMPELLING THE PERFORMANCE
  1. Introduction of Charge for Compelling the Performance and Changes Thereto
  2. Legal Significance and Characteristics of Charge for Compelling the Performance
 III. STATUS OF OPERATION OF CHARGE SYSTEM FOR COMPELLING THE PERFORMANCE UNDER THE KOREAN CURRENT LAW
  1. Status of Korean Current Acts Prescribing Charge for Compelling the Performance
  2. Review of the Korean Current Acts Prescribing Charge for Compelling the Performance
 IV. ISSUES ON CHARGE FOR COMPELLING THE PERFORMANCE UNDER THE CURRENT ACTS AND IMPROVEMENT DIRECTION THEREOF IN KOREA
  1. Selective Introduction of Charge for Compelling the Performance
  2. Issues on Process of Imposing Charge for Compelling the Performance
  3. Discretion over Imposition of Charge for Compelling the Performance
  4. Standardization of Methods of Imposing Charge for Compelling the Performance
  5. Dissatisfaction with Charge for Compelling the Performance
  6. A Plan to Introduce Alternative Compulsory Imprisonment for Misdemeanor
 V. CONCLUSION
 [References]

키워드

저자

• Bong Seok, Choi [ Professor, Dongguk Univerisity, Seoul ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  DONGGUK LAW REVIEW

• 간기

  반년간

• pISSN

  2287-9676

• 수록기간

  2012~2025

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340