Earticle

현재 위치 Home

ARTICLES

Actual issues of improving the criminal justice : Korea's experience and practice

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 바로가기
  • 간행물
    DONGGUK LAW REVIEW 바로가기
  • 통권
    Volume 7 (2015.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.87-114
  • 저자
    Hwan Yong, Choi
  • 언어
    영어(ENG)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A319764

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

6,700원

원문정보

초록

영어
The executive power granted by law should be exercised throughout the entire process of criminal justice in accordance with the procedures and guidelines prescribed by law, and the laws governing such power shall be enacted withing the framework of the Constitution. It is true that the criminal justice system of the Republic of Korea has been used as a tool for oppressing citizens, and it has been customary in the practical operation of the system to accept investigation reports submitted by investigation agencies, including special judicial police and the Central Intelligency Agency, as they are, in determining guilt. Since the citizens' resistance in June 1987, constant efforts have been made to improve the Constitution of the Republic of Korea and its criminal justice system to substantive norms for the guarantee of human rights. In particular, the Constitutional Court established under the Constitution of 1987 have practically enforced the guarantee of fundamental human rights declared by the Constitution through its decisions on constitutional issues related to the criminal justice system, and judges and judicial officers have endeavored to realize the systems that they have learned from the United States and other advanced countries in judicial systems. As a result, the awareness that a judicial reform, as well as a political reform, was required had spread farther since 2003, discussions on the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Act had actively continued since the Act is the basis of the criminal justice system, and consequently the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Act of 2007 and an act on jury trials were passed by the National Assembly. It can be said that such improvements in the criminal justice system have contributed to the removal of public distrust in the judicial system, which citizens have experienced under the military dictatorship and authoritative rule and then in the course of overall democratization of society, and the advancement of the judicial system up to the international level. Nevertheless, in order to do away with citizens' distrust in the criminal judicial process, it is still required to make efforts to secure transparency in the criminal judicial process, change the paradigm "from criminal justice for people to criminal justice by people," and improve the system in the direction coherent with "constitutional criminal litigation."

목차

Abstracts
 I. Introduction
 II. Meaning and History of Criminal Justice System
  1. Meaning of Criminal Justice System
  2. History
  3. Improving the Criminal Justice System: Directions
 III. Ideals and Principles of Criminal Justice under the Constitution
  1. Guarantee of Liberty of Person and Criminal Justice
  2. Substantive Guarantee of Liberty of One's Person by the Constitution
  3. Procedural Guarantee of Liberty of Person under the Constitution
 IV. Judicial Reform and Improvement of Criminal Justice System
  1. Major Features of Jury System and Improvements Needed
  2. Highlights of the Revised Criminal Procedure Act 2007
 V. Conclusion : Assessment of Improvements in Korea's Criminal Procedure
 [References]

키워드

Criminal justice system Constitution Jury System Judicial system Basic rights Judicial independence Accountability

저자

  • Hwan Yong, Choi [ Senior Research Fellow, Korea Legislation Research Institute ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 [The Institute of Comparative Law and Legal Culture]
  • 설립연도
    2000
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    본 연구소에서는 세계 각국의 새로운 법률제도를 그때그때 입수하여 이를 소개하고 한국 실정에 접목가능성을 연구·분석한다. 아울러 본 연구소는 국내의 각종 학술단체, 연구소, 연구기관과의 교류를 증진함은 물론 외국대학의 연구소와 공동연구를 통해 외국의 법문화와 학풍을 소개함으로써 대외적인 학풍선양에도 기여하게 함을 목적으로 한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    DONGGUK LAW REVIEW
  • 간기
    반년간
  • pISSN
    2287-9676
  • 수록기간
    2012~2025
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / DONGGUK LAW REVIEW Volume 7

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장