Earticle

현재 위치 Home

우리나라 大學敎授의 硏究ㆍ敎育活動과 生産性에 관한 硏究
The Relation Between University Faculty Job Satisfaction , Role Conflict , Task Clarity and Productivity
우리나라 대학교수의 연구ㆍ교육활동과 생산성에 관한 연구

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국생산성학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    생산성연구: 국제융합학술지 바로가기
  • 통권
    제2권 (1988.03)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.11-32
  • 저자
    辛容輝, 朴相範, 李載植
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A317667

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
For many years researchers have investigated the relation of job satisfaction to a variety of variables, especially productivity. This interest in the study of job satisfaction is due mainly to its role as a potential predictor of other organizational factors, such as improved performance, and reduction in turnover and absenteeism. There has been general agreement in theories of management and social psychology that people who are more satisfied in their jobs will attain higher levels of productivity. Contrary to this idea, however, recently satisfaction has been causally explained in terms of productivity. The relation between productivity and satisfaction is also affected by other constructs, including role conflict and task clarity. According to the model which was developed in this study, it is argued that task clarity has a direct effect on productivity and productivity directly causes satisfaction (satisfaction with extrinsic, intrinsic and environmental rewards). Additionally, it was hypothesized that, there is a negative but low relation between role conflict and productivity, and that role conflict is both directly and indirectly related negatively to satisfaction. This study, then, examined the relation between role conflict, task clarity, productivity, and job satisfaction. The analysis utilized the data collected from 160full-time faculty members in both national and private universities. The $quot;Faculty Satisfaction with Rewards$quot; instrument was adapted for use in higher education and included three subscales : Extrinsic, Intrinsic, and Environmental Satisfaction, The $quot;Task Clarity and Role Conflict$quot; instrument was used to measure the amount of conflict and task clarity which professors experienced in their job. The third instrument, a $quot;Productivity Index$quot; was developed to measure the extent of scholarship and service activities being conducted by the professors at the University. The statistical methods used to test the hypotheses were the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and multiple regression analysis. Multiple regression analysis yielded numerical coefficients for single and multiple combinations of factors. A significant negative relation was evident between role conflict and job satisfaction, and a positive relation was found between task clarity and job satisfaction. The relation between job satisfaction, role conflict, task clarity and productivity were not significant. Role conflict and task clarity did explain a significant amount of variance in satisfaction in addition to that explained by productivity. Contrary to the hypothesis, the interaction of task clarity and role conflict did not explain a significant portion of the variance in job satisfaction in addition to that explained by the linear combination of role conflict, task clarity, and productivity. Contrary to theory, there was no significant relation between productivity and job satisfaction, role conflict, and task clarity. But the relation between job satisfaction with role conflict and task clarity was significant. Therefore administrators should bring the maximum clarification to the faculty in three areas of teaching, publication, and service to try to eliminate role conflict. Since there is not any significant relation between satisfaction and productivity, administrators apparently must seek other answers such as reward structures to influence the productivity of faculty members. For further research, this study can be expanded by considering teaching effectiveness as another index of faculty productivity. The productivity measurement should be more precise. Also tenure of full-time faculty members might be considered in future studies, because of the current debate over the nature of tenure as a faculty reward. In addition, this study should be repeated with populations from other Universities in the Republic of Korea in order to ascertain the consistency of the findings.

목차

I. 서언
 II. 생산성과 영향변수와의 관계
  1. 생산성
  2. 직무만족과 생산성
  3. 역할갈등과 생산성
  4. 과업명확성과 생산성
 III. 연구조사 및 분석방법
  1. 설문작성 및 구성변수
  2. 표본추출 및 자료수집
  3. 자료분석방법 및 한계
 IV. 자료분석 및 가설검증
  1. 연구의 모형과 가설설정
  2. 사용변수에 대한 기본 통계량
  3. 가설검증
 V. 결어
 參考文獻
 

저자

  • 辛容輝 [ 신용휘 | 仁荷大學校 經商大學 經營學科 敎授 ]
  • 朴相範 [ 박상범 | 東國大學校 商經大學 經營學科 助敎授 ]
  • 李載植 [ 이재식 | 漢陽大學校 法商大學 經營學科 講師 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국생산성학회 [Korea Productivity Association]
  • 설립연도
    1985
  • 분야
    사회과학>경제학
  • 소개
    본 학회는 생산성에 관련된 학술연구의 진흥과 회원상호간의 친목을 도모함을 목적으로 한다. 그리고 다음의 사항에 주력한다. - 생산성에 관련된 학술연구의 진흥 - 생산성 향상을 위한 산학연계의 확립 - 회원상호간의 친교 및 정보교환 강화

간행물

  • 간행물명
    생산성연구: 국제융합학술지 [Productivity Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal]
  • 간기
    격월간
  • pISSN
    1225-3553
  • 수록기간
    1987~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 325 DDC 330

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 생산성연구: 국제융합학술지 제2권

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장