The aim of the present study was to compare three different forms of exercises namely lumbar stabilization, dynamic strengthening, and Pi-lates on chronic low back pain (LBP) in terms of pain, range of motion, core strength and function. In this study, 44 subjects suffering from non-specific LBP for more than 3 months were randomly allocated into the lumbar stabilization group, the dynamic strengthening group, and the Pilates group. Ten sessions of exercises for 3 weeks were prescribed along with interferential current and hot moist pack. Pain was assessed by visual analog scale, functional affection by modified Oswestry Dis-ability Questionnaire, range of motion by assessing lumbar flexion and extension by modified Schober test and core strength was assessed by pressure biofeedback on day 1 and day 10 of the treatment. There was reduction of pain, improvement in range of motion, functional ability and core strength in all the 3 exercise groups. The improvement was signifi-cantly greater in the lumbar stabilization group for all the outcome mea-sures, when compared the posttreatment after 10th session. Pairwise comparison showed that there was greater reduction of disability in the Pilates group than the dynamic strengthening group. It was concluded that the lumbar stabilization is more superior compared to the dynamic strengthening and Pilates in chronic nonspecific LBP. However, long-term benefits need to be assessed and compared with prospective fol-low-up studies.
목차
Abstract INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Study design Participants Intervention Procedure for assessment Intervention Statistical analysis RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES
키워드
Chronic low back painLumbar stabilizationDynamic strengtheningPilates
저자
Esha A. Bhadauria [ Department of Orthopaedics Physiotherapy, KLE University’s Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, India ]
Corresponding author
Peeyoosha Gurudut [ Department of Orthopaedics Physiotherapy, KLE University’s Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, India ]