Earticle

초록

영어

This paper analyzes the scholarly approaches to the problem of “local” vs. “cosmopolitan” in the context of the cultural transfers between South and Southeast Asia. Taking the “localization” paradigm advanced by Oliver Wolters as its pivot, it reviews the “externalist” and “autonomous” positions, and questions the hermeneutical validity of the fuzzy and self-explanatory category of “local.” Having discussed the geo-environmental metaphors of “Monsoon Asia” and “Maritime Asia” as alternative paradigms to make justice to the complex dynamics of transregional interaction that shaped South and Southeast Asian societies, it briefly presents two case studies highlighting the tensions between the “local” and “cosmopolitan” approaches to the study of Old Javanese literature and Balinese Hinduism.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. Introduction: Oliver Wolters and the “Indigenistic” Paradigm in Southeast Asian Studies
 Ⅱ. Defining Southeast Asia—Between the “Externalist” and “Autonomous” Viewpoints
  2.1. Cosmopolitanism Ante Litteram: From “Inde Transgangétique” to the “Greater India” movement
  2.2. The “Autonomous” Paradigm
  2.3. Towards a Change of Paradigm
  2.4. The “Externalist” Reaction: The Sanskrit Cosmopolis
 Ⅲ. The New Wave: An Emphasis on Networks and Synchronisms
 Ⅳ. Redefining the Region: Monsoon Asia and Maritime Asia
 Ⅴ. Revisiting the “Local”
 Ⅵ. The Local vs. Cosmopolitan in Old Javanese and Balinese Studies
 Ⅶ. Conclusion
 References

키워드

저자

• Andrea Acri [ École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris and Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre, ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  수완나부미 [Suvannabhumi]

• 간기

  반년간

• pISSN

  2092-738X

• 수록기간

  ~2020

• 십진분류

  KDC 309 DDC 306