No one can deny the fact that dismissal protection legal principles is an important area of labor law system. As long as the law and the case is not changed, effort to strengthen or weaken is meaningless. More than anything, the systematization of basic principles for dismissal also appear to need. Proportionality principle or last resort principle of dismissal has been built to a precedent legal principles. however, the need to be a variety of realistic dismissal legislation system are appeared. I think that a realistic goal considered in improving the dismissal law is something else. The first is to correct the nature of the dismissal system. The dismissal system forever can not be put in the area of the disciplinary system. Secondly, in relation to the dismissal relief systems, to enhance their effectiveness and to increase the accessibility to legal parties. Because, minimizing the consumption dispute is also to reduce the social burden. In the course of the reorganization of the German dismissal legal system, these points have been emphasized, it is seen as largely to suggest to us. Germany has taken a single legal systems related to dismissal. By providing a relatively diverse system, It planned detailed clarity. However, regulations on the current Labor Standards Act related dismissal does not reflect the structure of validity judgment and attribute and procedure of the various legal systems. Dismissal legal system is not dependent on the labor operational custom. This is intended to mean that they neglect a variety of legal disputes that it can come from dismissal, further overlooked that even how such conflict induces. There is a need to actualization and specialization of standard that improving predictability on Judicial outcome related dismissal. As a result, it is important that the dismissal norms operate substantially in labor and management both. Users should realize that they should comply with the provisions on the dismissal legal system, workers also easily make a conclusion about what kind of legal action that are possible in relation to the dismissal performed. Advancement of the dismissal system is not relaxation and strengthening of dismissal law, It must be focused on concentrate that dismissal institutional system to work effectively from the reality of the labor.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설 Ⅱ. 독일 해고법 상 해고의 정당성 판단 체계 재검토 Ⅲ. 독일 해고 구제 관련 절차법 체계 재검토 및 시사점 Ⅳ. 결론 참고문헌
키워드
해고노동법원해고원인해고통지해고보호법리소송절차의 간이화DismissalLaborcourtCause of DismissalNotice of dismissalLegal Protectionsprinciples against DismisslSimplification of Precedure
한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
설립연도
1997
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다.
학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.