Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this study is to re-examine the ‘i’ category as adjective focused on the negational form of the ‘derivational noun(N+적)+ida’. In the previous studies, the negational form of ‘ida’ has been regarded as ‘anida’ exclusively, however, the predicative nucleus of ‘ida’ construction is not ‘i’ but the element before ‘i’, therefore the negational form of ‘i’ can be changed according to the preceding element of ‘i’, such as ‘-지 않-’ in the case of ‘derivational noun(N+적)’. ‘derivational noun(N+적)’ is the most marked among the nouns which are located before ‘i’, it has adjectival meaning due to ‘-적’ and shows the long negational form ‘-지 않-’ like adjective. Although the ‘i’ shows the characteristics of adjective like long negational form, the word class of ‘i’ can not be adjective. The reasons are such as followings: First, the preceding element of ‘i’, such as ‘derivational noun(N+적)’ is the morphological and syntactical nucleus, so the ‘i’ is not the lexical category, but the functional category. Second, there are great differences between the general adjectives and ‘i’. Third, ‘derivational noun(N+적)+ida’ corresponds to adjective or verb from the perspective of contrastive linguistics, so the ‘i’ solely cannot be adjective excluding ‘derivational noun(N+적)’. Fourth, if the copula ‘i’ would be adjectives, it disagrees with the characteristics of the korean language as verb-like adjectives which functions as predicate without copula.

목차

Abstract
 1. 서론
 2. ‘이다’와 ‘아니다’ 대응의 문제점
  2.1. ‘이다’의 부정형이 ‘아니다’이며 ‘아니다’와 대응 어구를이루는 단위는 ‘이다’인가?
  2.2. ‘이다’의 부정인 ‘아니다’가 형용사와 같은 활용을 하며형용사의 특성을 가지는가?
 3. 다양한 범주적 관점에서의 ‘파생명사(N+적)+이다’ 분석
  3.1. 용언
  3.2. 기능동사
  3.3. 접사
  3.4. 형식동사
 4. 유형론적 관점: 동사형 형용사와 계사
 5. 결론
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 김건희 [ Kim keon-hee | 서원대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  언어 [Korean Journal of Linguistics]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1229-4039

• 수록기간

  1976~2017

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 710 DDC 195