Earticle

초록

영어

This paper introduces a new approach method on science and technology level assessment by using growth curve model concept. It may make readers possible to understand in dynamic analysis approach since growth model is rooted on the historical and empirical development of measuring biological growth pattern of plants, animals and viruses, etc. The paper used Gompertz and Weibull models and compared both models or which model might be better fitting. The Gompertz growth curve model has been the only and popular one used to analyze general technology level assessment in Korea for the last ten years since Bark(2007). There has been some arguments about possibility of other substitute model for the matter including Weibull model. Kim and Bark(2015) introduced the Weibull growth curve model to measure the technology level assessment of some fishery areas. This study tries widening its usage for more general scope of technology areas by introducing the result of fishery and construction engineering areas, which are relatively compared in terms of technology characteristics of its own. The study draws possible conclusion to see whether both Gompertz and Weibull models better represent growth pattern of biological oriented ones or which one better fits. Adding to that, the paper tries to see whether science and technology growth patterns of these two concerned areas are similar or identical with time lag between Korea and countries with the state-of-the art including Japan.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 모형에 대한 논의
 Ⅲ. 사례연구 비교
 Ⅳ. 모형 추정
 Ⅴ. 추정 결과 추가 논의
 Ⅵ. 결론
 참고문헌
 논문초록

키워드

성장모형 기술수준평가 수산과학기술 건설엔지니어링 기술 한국 일본 growth curve model technology level assessment fishery science & technology construction engineering technology Korea Japan

저자

• 김완민 [ Kim, Wan-Min | 부경대학교 경영대학 ]
• 박주찬 [ Park, Ju-Chan | (재)부산테크노파크 정책기획단 ]
• 박병무 [ Bark, Pyeng-Mu | 부경대학교 기술경영전문대학원 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물