증언의 맥락과 의미화 : 한국, 대만, 일본의 ‘일본군 위안부’ 다큐멘터리 비교
The Context & Signification of Testimony : Comparison of Documentaries on Japanese Military ‘Comfort Women’ produced by Korea, Taiwan and Japan
This paper contextualized the different texture and meaning revealed in the midst of representation of comfort women through the comparative analysis of documentary films on ‘comfort women’ which were produced by Korea, Taiwan and Japan. The framing methods of comfort women survivors is overlapped, or differentiated from each other according to the awareness within society and the nation’s identity, and the government’s role. This paper had a discussion about one’s eyes and emotion involved in sharing and difference, and East Asian contexts of politics and ethics. The Korean film director Byun’s films are discriminative in that his films realize comfort women’s testimony as the process of growth into a social agent making their own voice other than comfort women victims’ being the object of compassion. The testimony of the former comfort women victims in the films becomes a performative stage in which they raise up their own distress into the expression of social wounds. In addition, there appears an excessive subjectivation phenomenon in which comfort women survivors are self-conscious. This reflects a desperate situation where they have no choice but to be an activist who performs a new history writing herself under the circumstances where the government fails to properly play its corresponding role in comparison with the people’s strong will for nationalism. In contrast, Japanese documentary puts more emphasis on interviews including detailed stories of victims instead of providing the historical information related to comfort women system. Main focus is striving to try discover individual human’s portrait hidden behind a group. Comparing to Byun’s documentary, the comfort women survivors seem to be relatively free from the camera. In addition, activists’ voices are minimized. Such a representation method has a strategic meaning of breaking through the Japanese government’s attitude of not taking into account the individual victims at all but putting nation-to-nation relations ahead of everything in handling the issue of compensation for comfort women. Although the historical trajectory of Taiwan was similar to that of Korea, but Taiwanese documentary film shows the difference in that emotional aspects of victimized women such as distress and grief are highlighted. Taiwanese film shows the tendency to approach comfort women’s suffering as the issue of a wounded citizen due to warfare other than the issue of nationality. In addition, they tend to give a lot more weight to understanding and consolation of an individual’s pain rather than putting emphasis on collective power for change. The emotion of sadness, which dominates film, belongs to psychological reality of Taiwanese who have been under the long political suppression, together with relatively weak nationalism, complex sentiment toward Japan, and unclear state identity.
목차
Ⅰ. 아시아 트라우마, ‘일본군 위안부’ Ⅱ. 역사 기술과 과잉 주체화: 변영주의 위안부 다큐멘터리 3부작 Ⅲ. 개인과 휴머니티: 일본의 <기억과 함께 산다> Ⅳ. 슬픔과 비밀: 대만의 <50년간의 비밀> Ⅴ. 위안부 위치짓기와 국민/국가 참고문헌 논문초록
키워드
일본군 위안부아시아국민-국가다큐멘터리재현서사감정Japanese military ‘comfort women’AsiaNation-StateDocumentaryRepresentationnarrativeEmotion
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.