Earticle

초록

영어

In fact, U.S still utilizes the unilateral measures, against its major trading partner, in particular, Korea and ANICs, such as the section 301 of the trade act of 1974, as amended(regular 301, super 301, etc.), and its derivatives even under the U.R compromise and the WTO system. In this paper, we review the implications of the logic and perspective of the U.S commercial policy and Korean`s opposite methods. In future, it seems that the U.S. intended to use the Threat Effect of section 301, and thereby assume a more advantageous negotiating position in the matter of liberalizing the Korea. Although USTR has actively utilized the regular 301 provision. it has hardly apply Super 301 nor Special 301 provisions which are to correct foreign countries` unfair practices comprehensively by identified priority foreign countries practices and negotiating with the foreign countries.

목차

I. 序論
 II. 美圍 通商政第의 論理
  1. 保護貿易主義
  2. 相互主義와 公正貿易
  3. 二國間主義의 擴大
 III. 美國 通商政策의 主要 規制措置
  1. 不公正 規制措置
  2. 一方的 規制措置(通商法 301 條 中心)
 IV. 美園 通團政策에 대한 韓圍의 對應方案
 V. 結論
 參考文獻
 Abstract

저자

• 崔永坤 [ 최영곤 | 한국경영문제연구소 연구원, 동아대학교 경영대학 무역학과 강사 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  기업경영연구 [Korean Corporation Management Review]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1229-957X

• 수록기간

  1994~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 325 DDC 658