Earticle

초록

영어

This paper aims to distinguish synecdoche from metonymy. For this purpose, the previous studies of metonymy and synecdoche were reviewed. Also, the problems of the previous studies were discussed. This paper, revising the definition of metonymy and synecdoche that Seto defined, proposes the definition of them: metonymy is a referential transfer phenomenon based on the contiguity between entities or categories, while synecdoche is a referential transfer phenomenon based on the inclusion between part and whole within a single entity or category. Also, this paper proposes the distinction between metonymy and synecdoche as the following figure shows. metonymysynecdochenature of relationshipcontiguityinclusion function of relationshipreferential transfer between entities or categories referential transfer between part and whole within a single entity or category Thus defined and distinguished, synecdoche is not a mere subtype of metonymy but an independent trope.

목차

1. 서론
 2. Lakoff와 그의 동료학자들의 주장
  2.1 Lakoff and Johnson (1980)
  2.2 Lakoff(1987)
  2.3 Lakoff and Turner(1989)
 3. Seto(1999)의 주장
  3.1 전통적 주장 및 Lakoff의 주장에 대한 비판
  3.2 전체와 부분의 중의성
  3.3 환유와 실체관계
  3.4 제유와 범주관계
 4. 새로운 제안 : 환유와 제유의 구분
  4.1. Seto의 주장에 대하여
  4.2 환유와 제유의 정의와 구분
 5. 결론
 참고문헌
 Abstract

키워드

저자

• 김기수 [ Kim, Ki-Soo | 세명대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  영어영문학연구 [The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-3293

• 수록기간

  1968~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 840 DDC 810