Earticle

초록

영어

In this paper, we have examined the binding behavior of two types of anaphoric forms. We have argued that the plural anaphoric forms and pro readily admit a bound variable interpretation, whereas singular anaphoric forms rarely do it. This phenomenon is mostly observed in some languages. The results observed in this paper confirm that there are specialized anaphoric forms corresponding to quantifiers. However, the real picture of the interpretive distinction between singular forms and plural forms is not that simple in light of English. Furthermore, our observation is only limited to some languages. Another observation made in this paper is the problem of complementary distribution, one of the empirical problems raised in the binding theory. We demonstrate that when anaphors and pronominals are not in complementary distribution, they are not identically interpreted. We have argued that it is justified by the requirement of the Semantic Competition Principle. However even so, we know nothing about what the syntactic condition of that phenomenon is. We will leave it for further research.

목차

I . Introduction
 II. Empirical Problems 01 Binding
 III. Russian, Spanish and their Specialized Forms
 IV. Pronouns and Specialized Forms
  4.1. Evidence from Japanese
  4.2. Evidence from Korean
  4.3. Evidence from Engllsh
  4.4 Evidence from Russian
 V. The Problem of Complementary Distribution
  5.1. Indirect/direct thouQht Test
  5.2. De re interpretation Test
  5.3. Deflnite/lndefinite Test
 VI. Conclusion
 Works Cited
 ABSTRACT

키워드

대용어 결속 결속변항 전문화된 표현들 결속이론의 경험적인 문제들 양화사 Anaphora Binding A Bound Variable Specialized Forms Empirical Problems of the Binding Theory Quantifiers

저자

• Kang Nam-Kil [ 강남길 | Far East University ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물