Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this paper is to review May’s (1977, 1985) Quantifier Raising in Autonomous Syntax, to look for problems in QR and to find out how the native speakers express themselves when there are some problems. First, in Autonomous Syntax the Empty Category Principle doesn’t play enough role to get rid of ill-formed sentences with regard to quantifier raising in Logical Form. Second, Quantifier Raising does not show consistency in raising quantifiers because sometimes quantifier adjoins to VP and other times it adjoins to IP. Third, there are some differences between Indo-European Languages and East Asian Languages in the interpretation of (1). (1) Someone loves everyone. (2) a. There exists (very loving) x such that for every y, x loves y. b. For every y, there is (in this lucky world) some x or other who loves y. Even native informants have a hard time obtaining (2b) reading. And even if they want to have (2b) reading, they do not speak like (1). Rather, they would speak like (3a, b). (3) a. Some other persons love everyone. b. Some other people love everyone. Interestingly, the claim exists in the literature that in East Asian languages, (2b) reading is not possible either. So we should analyse languages differently according to the intuition of the native speakers.

목차

I. 서론
 II. 자율통사론과 양화사 인상
 III. 양화사 인상과 자율통사론의 문제점
 IV. 결론
 Works Cited
 Abstract

키워드

양화사 전칭 양화사 존재 양화사 양화사 인상 자율통사론 작용역 원리 보편 문법 Quantifier Universal Quantifier Existential Quantifier Quantifier Raising Autonomous Syntax Scope Principle Universal Grammar

저자

• 김상혁 [ Kim, Sang-hyuk | 충주대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물