Earticle

초록

영어

The analysis of resultative sentences in this paper is based on Goldberg’s (1995) constructional view. Under the constructional view, resultative sentences are assumed to be composed of verbal subevent and constructional subevent. Accoring to Goldberg and Jackendoff’s (2004) Causal Relation Hypithesis, the verbal subevent and constructional subevent must be integrated via causal relationship. For the causal relationship, I suggest two types of causal relationship, direct and logical cause-result relationship and indirect and phenomenal cause-effect relationship, and describe the causal relation by the combination of features, [logical] and [phenomenal]. I also revise Goldberg and Jackendoff’s (2004) Causal Relation Hypothesis, saying that the verbal subevent and the constructional subevent must be integrated via a [+logical, +phenomenal] causal relationship. With the revised causal relation hypothesis, I can give an explanation for the various grammaticality on the resultatives, and provide a unified account for the semantic constraints between verb and argument and between arguments. The revised causal relation hypothesis also suggests that the whole sentences should be considered in deciding the grammaticality of resultatives rather than the categories which cause a conflict in meaning.

목차

I. 서론
 II. 논리적 인과관계와 현상적 인과관계
 III. 하위사건과 인과관계
 IV. 논리적 인과관계
 V. 결론
 Works Cited
 Abstract

키워드

동사 하위사건 구조 하위사건 인과관계 의미제약 논리적 현상적 verbal subevent constructional subevent causal relationship semantic constraint logical phenomenal

저자

• 탁기현 [ Kihyun Tak | 상지대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물