Earticle

초록

영어

This paper aims to suggest a unified model of metaphor interpretation that reconciles two competing models, conceptual metaphor model and attributive categorization model. There has been much debate about which model offers the most veridical account of how people interpret metaphors. But there is the possibility of reconciling two rival models. Proponents of conceptual metaphor and attributive categorization models of metaphor have differently sampled metaphors. Proponents of conceptual metaphor model have chosen relational and double metaphors, but proponents of attributive categorization model have chosen double and attributional metaphors. Also proponents of conceptual metaphor model have chosen novel and conventional metaphors, but proponents of attributive categorization model have chosen conventional and dead metaphors. I here offer a unified model of metaphor interpretation (31). In model (31) there are three types of metaphor. Type 1 metaphors are interpreted in a comparison mode, type 2 metaphors are interpreted in a comparison mode in some contexts and in a categorization mode in other contexts. and type 3 metaphors are interpreted in a categorization mode. Type 1 is novel, relational metaphors, type 2 is conventional, double metaphors, and type 3 is dead, attributional metaphors.

목차

1. 서론
 2. 개념은유모델과 속성범주화모델
  2.1 개념은유모델
  2.2 속성범주화모델
  2.3 두 모델의 비교
 3. 통합 모델
  3.1 관계구조와 속성
  3.2 관용성
  3.3 통합모델
 4. 결론
 Works Cited
 Abstract

키워드

저자

• 김기수 [ Kim, Ki-soo | 세명대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  영어영문학연구 [The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-3293

• 수록기간

  1968~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 840 DDC 810