Earticle

초록

영어

Modal expressions such as CAN and V-(u)l-swu iss ‘can’ are ambiguously interpreted. That is, The English modal can is ambiguous between a root modal (i.e., RM) reading denoting an ability/capability reading and an epistemic modal (i.e., EM) reading denoting a possibility/probability reading. In the same vein, The modal external negation disambiguates the modal reading: only the RM reading survives, while the EM reading is suppressed. The embedded focus bearing element in the EM reading cannot bear a presupposed interpretation in spec-C, since the plain topic cannot be compatible with the embedded spec-C. Thus, the focus bearing element between an interrogative C and wh-in-situ in the EM reading always induces the intervention effect. More importantly, when the nun-marked subject occurs in the modal V-(u)l-swu iss ‘can’ context, only the RM reading survives. That is, the plain topic plays an important role that disambiguates the modal reading. This leads us to believe that the real reason why the modal external negation context induces the sentence to only bear the RM reading is because the subject in such a context plays a topic. It logically follows that the subject in the modal external negation context such as V-(u)l-swu eps ‘cannot’ should be a topic, which always induces the intervention effect to be cancelled.

목차

I. Introduction
 II. RM and EM Readings in the Modal V-(u)l-swu iss 'can' Context
 III. Modal Structures
 IV. Cancellation of Intervention Effects in the Modal External Negation Context
 V. Conclusion
 Works Cited
 Abstract

키워드

간섭효과 무효화 초점 인식의미 조동사외부부정 본래의미 화제 제자리 의문사 cancellation of the intervention effect focus EM modal external negation RM topic wh-in-situ

저자

• Lee Doo-Won [ 이두원 | Korea National University of Transportation ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물