Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this paper is to discuss some claims of the earlier and later versions of the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), assess two objections directed at it: (1) circularity and (2) faulty typology, and suggest, revising Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez & Otal Campo’s taxonomic criterion, a new classification of metaphors. Unlike previous theories, Lakoff & Johnson (1980), who first proposed CMT, argued that metaphor is not primarily a matter of language but of cognition. Later Lakoff (1987) and Johnson (1987) argued that metaphor is not simply linguistic and conceptual but also bodily in nature. In recent years, Lakoff and Johnson (1999) have developed a more complex version of CMT with the introduction of primary metaphors which are considered as one important advance in it. It is also argued that the evidence for conceptual metaphors comes from cognitive linguistic analyses of conventional expressions, novel extensions, and polysemy. And it is shown that evidence abounds that makes objection (1) obsolete, but objection (2) is justified. Therefore, this paper proposes, revising Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez & Otal Campo’s taxonomic criterion, a new classification of metaphors as shown in figure 2. The basic division is between similarity and correlation metaphors. Similarity is at work in the case of ontological, image, and situational metaphors. Orientational, image-schematic, and propositional metaphors are based upon the correlation between two experiential domains.

목차

I. 서론
 II. 개념은유이론의 발전양상
  2.1 초기 개념은유이론
  2.2 최신 개념은유이론
 III. 개념은유이론의 지지 증거
  3.1 관용적 표현
  3.2 확장된 은유
  3.3 다의어
 IV. 개념은유이론의 문제점에 관한 평가와 개선방안
  4.1 순환성
  4.2 불완전한 유형
 V. 결론
 Works Cited
 Abstract

키워드

개념은유이론 개념은유 순환성 은유 유형 유사성 연관성 conceptual metaphor theory conceptual metaphor circularity metaphor type similarity correlation

저자

• 김기수 [ Kim, Ki-soo | 세명대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물