Earticle

초록

영어

Applying to standard clinical terminologies is essential for understanding the precise meanings of the clinical terminology used in EMR systems and sharing clinical data among health providers. In Korea, Korean standard terminology of medicine was first introduced as national standard vocabulary for EMR systems in 2014. However, there is little usage yet. So we studied on a comparison of diagnosis domain between Korean standard terminology of medicine and SNOMED CT adapted in many countries. Because it is the most important in medical statistics and clinical studies. Qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis and mapping ability were studied through literature review and structure analysis as methods. As a result, Korean standard terminology of medicine was satisfied in the concept orientation, concept permanence, non- semantic concept identifier and mapping to standards terminologies, support for multiple level. But it was not in the multi-hierarchy, language independence, formal definition and so on. And some problems was raveled in the structural aspect and mapping. This paper will help to utilize and improve KOSTOM.

목차

Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Kinds of Clinical Terminology
  2.1. Interface Terminology
  2.2. Reference Terminology
  2.3. Administrative Terminology
 3. Requirements for Terminology
  3.1. Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies
  3.2. Comparative Studies of Terminologies
 4. Comparative Analysis
  4.1. General Characteristics of Subjects
  4.2. Comparison by Evaluation Criteria of Terminology
  4.3. Structure of Contents
  4.4. Quantitative Evaluation
  4.5. Mapping to Classifications
 5. Discussion
 6. Conclusion
 References

키워드

저자

• Mijung Kim [ Dept. Of Health Administration, Cheju Halla University, Korea ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  International Journal of Database Theory and Application

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  2005-4270

• 수록기간

  2008~2016

• 십진분류

  KDC 505 DDC 605