Earticle

초록

영어

The Sino-Japanese Verbs of [V+N]type can be used some section that relative the noun element or cannot it. In the case, but, the Chinese of [V+N]type can’t be usually used it. In the result, the equivalent words of [V+N]type are varied between the Sino-Japanese Verbs and the chinese. In the sentence with not an indirect object(the ni case) or a direct object(the wo case), Sino-Japanese Verb and the Chinese can be used same letters(alphabets). In the sentence with an indirect object(the に case) or a direct object(the wo case), however, Sino-Japanese verb and the Chinese cannot be used same letters. At a time like this, the Chinese system is had an independent structure is ｢ba＋something＋VN｣ type, which is the object before the verb. There are the verbs of [V+N] type in Chinese. one case can be used like a vocabulary, another case needs a kind of new noun ,which is an indirect object(the ni case) or a direct object(the wo case). The other case, it equals the Sino-Japanese Verb. The equivalent for the word is varied since the diverseness makes a start to the difference of the meaning and the grammar between two languages. That is, the Chinese language rarely gets the section in sentence , the Japanese language has a unique sentence structure and the letters of Sino-Japanese are not always same the china alphabets. I think to needs the study is some inconsistency between the Sino-Japanese Verb systems of [V+N] type and its grammar. Accordingly I should study the point later.

목차

1. はじめに
 2. 先行研究の検討
 3. ｢動詞+名詞｣構造の漢語動詞と中国語
  3.1 対応するもの
  3.2 対応しないもの
 4. おわりに
 参考文献
 

키워드

저자

• 牟世鍾 [ 모세종 | 仁荷大学校 日本言語文化学科 教授 日本語学 ]
• 鄭春実 [ 정춘실 | 仁荷大学校 日語日本学科 博士課程 日本語学 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  일본언어문화 [Journal of japanese Language and Culture]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-9585

• 수록기간

  2002~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 730 DDC 495