Earticle

초록

영어

In general, “WAKEDA” represents a conclusion that is drawn as something natural from a ground. It takes the form of “WAKE” in interrogative sentences during conversations, and “WAKE” has different forms and meanings from “WAKEDA” in such a case. Previous studies reported that “WAKE” in the interrogative form had no semantic differences from “WAKEDA” representing the concluding, convincing, and paraphrasing nature. “WAKEDA” is originally a form to state a conclusion drawn from certain objective information or a fact concluded from some information. It is not used in cases of raising a question about something. Discussed in the study, “WAKE” represents the negative feeling of the speaker in the form of doubt inherent in an interrogative sentences when he or she draws a natural conclusion from the statement, attitude or act of the listener during a conversation and is not convinced of the conclusion. “WAKE” in interrogative sentences can be understood as the noun “WAKE” from a morphological perspective, but it represents making a connection from a semantic perspective. Its polite version is “Wakedesuka”, and its normal version is “WAKE”, based on which it is estimated that “WAKE” with the interrogative postposition “Ka” omitted is used as an interrogative form in interrogative sentences with the normal version. At a first glance, it may seem logically contradicting to express a fact concluded as something natural from the information that already exists in the form of interrogative sentences, but the interrogative form of “WAKE” is not to express a result accepted as something natural but a strong feeling of doubt that the speaker has about the result.

목차

1. はじめに
 2. 先行研究の検討
 3. 疑問文と｢わけ｣
  3.1 疑問文とは
  3.2 疑問文に用いられる｢わけ｣
 4. おわりに
 [參考文獻]
 

키워드

저자

• 牟世鍾 [ 모세종 | 仁荷大學校 敎授, 日本語學 ]
• 宋洙珍 [ 송수진 | 仁荷大學校 講師, 日本語學 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  일본언어문화 [Journal of japanese Language and Culture]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-9585

• 수록기간

  2002~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 730 DDC 495