Earticle

초록

영어

For Plato, ‘signifiant’ and ‘signifie’ are separable and only ‘signifie’ is universal, identical, immutable and independent. Classic French translation philosopher Berman criticizes Plato’s view on language of this kind which ranks the relationship between signifiant and signifie in ontological order. Plato’s ‘meaning-centered theory of translation’ inherently puts an original text in ontologically superior position to translated works by granting the original text such as a literary work an absolute status and authority similar to ‘eidos.’ ‘Meaning-centered translation’ borders Plato’s representative relationship, which means that ontological status of ‘B’ is decided by the degree of closeness to upper-level ‘A.’ Substituting this in translation, upper-level ‘A’ becomes ‘original text’ while lower level ‘B’ becomes ‘translated work’, and translated work ‘B’s status is decided on how close ‘B’ is to original ‘A’ or how closely ‘B’ represents or reproduces the original ‘A’. Therefore, ‘B=translated work’ becomes subordinate, secondary, derivative, inferior and marginal to ‘A=original text.’ The purpose of this study is to reflect on translation ethics from non-representative perspective of Deleuze who criticized Plato’s representative theory of translation and apply this to ‘Kitchen’ literature translation.

목차

ABSTRACT
 I. 들어가기
 II. 철학 담론으로서의 ‘직역 對 의역’
 III. 비재현(非再現)적 번역
 IV. 번역윤리
 V. 문학번역과 번역윤리
  1. 『키친』(민음사, 1999)
  2. 『8월의 저편』(2004, 동아일보사)
 VI. 나가기
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 박미정 [ Park, Mijung | 한국외국어대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  통역과 번역 [Interpretation and Translation]

• 간기

  연3회

• pISSN

  1229-6074

• 수록기간

  1999~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 717 DDC 400