Individual terror of the modern kind came to be practiced by some of Korea’s militant nationalists at the end of the first decade of the twentieth century. The historical background for this was the frustration brought on by the inability of the Taehan Empire to defend itself effectively from the ongoing colonization by Japan. Culturally, nationalist individual terror was rooted in the Confucian respect towards those “killing themselves in the name of humaneness” (salsin sŏng’in), but was also influenced by reports on the deeds of Russian, Polish and other “nihilists” that often appeared in the Korean press in the first decade of the twentieth century. The topic of this article is the reverse gaze—the perceptions of the Korean nationalist terror by Russian and, later, Soviet observers. That the Russian press outlets influenced by revolutionary radicals fully justified An Chunggŭn’s 1909 assassination of Itō Hirobumi, was to be expected. However, even some conservative dailies also took An Chunggŭn’s side, ascribing the assassination to the brutalities accompanying the Japanese colonization of Korea. A number of Maritime province-based news outlets, such as Priamurye, attempted a balanced, neutral approach of sorts. Given the lingering hostility towards Russia’s erstwhile battlefield enemy, Japan, and the prevalence of individual terrorism inside Russia’s own anti-autocracy struggle, the semi-sympathetic stance towards An Chunggŭn’s shooting of Itō was perhaps natural. Similar attitudes towards Korean nationalist acts of individual terror continued further into the Soviet period: militant nationalists were expected to become Korean Communists’ allies in the future.
목차
Abstract IN PLACE OF A PREFACE: SHARED TEMPORALITIES, SHARED PROBLÉMATIQUE: RUSSIA: LIBERATIONAL TERROR? KOREA: TERROR AS WAR AND/OR JUSTICE BY OTHER MEANS? CONFLATION OF TWO TERRORIST TRADITIONS? THE SOVIET VIEW: FROM INDIVIDUAL TERRORISM TO THE ARMED UPRISING CONCLUSION REFERENCES
키워드
terrorismAn Chunggŭn“nihilists”Korean nationalismKorean indepen-dence movement
저자
VLADIMIR TIKHONOV [ a professor in the Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages, Oslo University, Norway. ]
한국연구원은 1970년 5월 한국 민속의 각 분야에 걸친 자료의 수집과 학술적 연구를 목적으로 '한국민속연구소'로 출발하였다. 그 후 1973년 5월 연구 분야를 확대하며 민속뿐만 아니라 한국학 전반에 걸친 연구를 위해 '한국학연구소'로 개편하였고, 다시 1989년 3월 한국의 국제적 위상의 부상과 함께 한국학 연구의 중요성이 높아짐에 따라 '한국학연구원'으로 확대, 개편하였다. 한국학연구원은 한국학 전반에 걸친 연구를 통해 지역과 민족문화 발전에 기여하며 한국학의 세계화를 위해서 학술활동을 강화하고 나아가 내·외국인에 대한 한국문화 교육을 담당하고자 한다.