Earticle

초록

영어

This article overviews the problems of the 「Artists’ Welfare Act」 which is enacted in 2011 and the overcoming measures, from a comparative perspective with 「Act on the Development of Mass Culture and Art Industry」 which is enacted in 2014 rather than own point of 「Artists’ Welfare Act」. First, after comparing the concept of “Artist” from the 「Artists’ Welfare Act」 and the concept of “Artist of Mass Culture” from 「Act on the Development of Mass Culture and Art Industry」, this article defined ‘Pure Artists’ as a complementary set of the former concept which excludes the latter concept. Based on this, this article analyzed Pure Artists a monthly average income comparing the monthly minimum wage and the monthly minimum cost of living, and investigated whether ‘Pure Artists’ joined the grand four insurance or not just as Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance, Employment Insurance, National Health Insurance, National Pension, so ultimately could check the deteriorated economic status of ‘Pure Artists’. For to deviate from criticism that 「Artists’ Welfare Act」has just declarative sense and to resolve this problem, a protective method for rising artists should be prepared, and joining the grand four insurance or not must be differed subdividing economic status of artists. Besides, reinforcing restriction level with creating penal provisions in 「Artists’ Welfare Act」 could be considered, but it would be enough through modulating upper limit of fine for negligence.

목차

Ⅰ. 시작하며
 Ⅱ. 「예술인 복지법」의 개선 필요성 : 대중예술분야와의 비교
 Ⅲ. 「예술인 복지법」상 문제되는 쟁점과 개선 방안의 검토
 Ⅳ. 마무리하며
 참고문헌
 

키워드

저자

• 조형찬 [ Jo, Hyoung-Chan | 서울대학교 법학전문대학원 전문석사과정. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  원광법학 [Journal of Law research]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-429X

• eISSN

  2508-4526

• 수록기간

  1962~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340