Earticle

초록

영어

Charles Knight argues that women satirists were barely found until the 20th century because of two facts. First, during the 18th and 19th centuries women could not access the public sphere and consequently couldn't write satire which is essentially related to public issues; Secondly, since satire is a kind of masculine genre aimed to attack other people or public matters, it was unsuitable for women to write it. In opposition to Knight's argument, in this paper I argue that despite of their unaccessibility to the public sphere, 19th century women writers satirized public issues in their novels. As one example of this, I demonstrate that in her work, Female Quixotism, one of the first American women writers, Tabitha Gilman Tenney, satirizes public issues such as unfair female education that does not allow women to get formal education as men do. Furthermore, she critiques the unfair marriage system that denies women's property rights, which ultimately results in women's subjugation. Through the duality of satire in this work, Tenney possibly deals with public discourses without directly accessing the public sphere. That is, on the surface, through the heroine Dorcasina, who reads romantic novels excessively, which leads her to misreading her false suitors as true ones, Female Quixotism satirizes female novel reading which was the trend at that time. As an undercurrent, Tenney attacks the unfair marriage system that usurps women's property rights and unjust female education that confines women to the domestic sphere by focusing on the education of “Republican Motherhood.”

목차

I. Introduction : Is Satire a Masculine Genre ?
 II. Reading the Undercurrent of Satire
 III. Sympathy as a Satirical Device
 IV. Conclusion : Unstable Irony and the Implied Readers
 Works Cited
 Abstract

키워드

저자

• Mi Ok Sa [ 사미옥 | 충북대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  미국소설 [마크 트웨인 리뷰]

• 간기

  연3회

• pISSN

  1738-5784

• 수록기간

  1991~2020

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 843 DDC 813