Earticle

초록

영어

The question is whether the act of using a company’s money to give bribes and to give bribes to persons administering another’s business in response to an illegal solicitation constitutes, aside from Giving Bribe or Giving Bribe by Breach of Trust, Occupational Embezzlement. Naturally if a person uses a company’s money for his or a third party’s gain, intent of unlawful gain can be acknowledged. However, when a person uses a company’s money for the company’s benefits, even if the act may be illegal, the question of whether intent of unlawful gain exists is a different matter. In conclusion, the intent of unlawful gain must be determined not by normative or procedural standards, but by whether or not the main purpose of the act, at the time, was for the defendant or third party’s gain, or for the victim’s gain.

목차

I. Introduction
 II. Past Supreme Court’s decisions and cases regarding whether intent of unlawful gain can be acknowledged when giving bribes with company’s money
  1. Introduction of the Issue
  2. Cases that acknowledged Occupational Embezzlement
  3. Cases that denied Occupational Embezzlement
 III. Supreme Court, 25 April 2013, Case no. 2011Do9238
  1. Introduction of the Issue
  2. Lower Courts’ decision
  3. Supreme Court decision
 IV. The Relation between Giving Bribe and Occupational Embezzlement
  1. The Difference between the benefits and protections of the law of Giving Bribe and Occupational Embezzlement
  2. Standard for Determining Intent of Unlawful Gain
  3. Determining whether an Act was for the Company’s Gain
 V. CONCLUSION
 Bibliography
 [ABSTRACT]

키워드

저자

• Jin-Uk, Kim [ Lawyer, Kim & Chang Law Office ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  DONGGUK LAW REVIEW

• 간기

  반년간

• pISSN

  2287-9676

• 수록기간

  2012~2025

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340