To overcome the hyperacute immune rejection during pig-to-non-human primates xenotranasplantation, we have produced and bred α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knock-out (GalT —/—) pigs. In this study, the somatic cells and tissues from the GalT —/— pigs were characterized by an analysis of the expression of Galα-1,3-Gal (α- Gal) epitope. Briefly, ear fibroblast cell lines of 19 homozygous GalT —/— pigs were established and cryopreserved. The expression of α-Gal epitope in the cells was measured by fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis using BS- I-B4 lectin. Also, the homozygous (GalT —/—) cells and tissues samples were immunostained with BS-I-B4 lectin for analysis of α-Gal epitope expression. The results showed that the expression of α-Gal epitope in GalT —/— cells (0.2 %) were significantly (p< 0.05) down-regulated to the range of cynomolgus monkey fibroblast (0.2 %) cells compared to heterozygous (GalT —/+) (9.3 %) and wild type (GalT +/+) (93.7 %) fibroblast cells. In the immunostaining results, while the expression of α-Gal epitope was detected a partly in GalT —/+ cells and mostly in GalT +/+ cells, it was almost not detected in the GalT —/— cells. Also, immunostaining results from various tissues of the GalT —/— pig showed that the expression of α-Gal epitope was not detectable, whereas various tissues from GalT +/+ pig showed a strong expression of α-Gal epitope. Our results demonstrated that α-Gal epitope expressions from GalT —/— pigs were successfully knocked out to prevent hyperacute immune rejection for further study of xenotransplantation.
목차
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS General Information Establishment of Ear Fibroblast Cell Lines Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter Analysis Immunostaining of Cells and Tissues Statistics RESULTS α-Gal Epitope Expressions by FACS Analysis α-Gal Epitope Expressions by Immunostaining DISCUSSION REFERENCES
In-Sul Hwang [ Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonbuk 55365, Republic of Korea ]
Dae-Jin Kwon [ Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonbuk 55365, Republic of Korea ]
Tae-Uk Kwak [ Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonbuk 55365, Republic of Korea ]
Keon Bong Oh [ Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonbuk 55365, Republic of Korea ]
Sun-A Ock [ Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonbuk 55365, Republic of Korea ]
Hak-Jae Chung [ Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonbuk 55365, Republic of Korea ]
Gi-Sun Im [ Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonbuk 55365, Republic of Korea ]
Seongsoo Hwang [ Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonbuk 55365, Republic of Korea ]
Corresponding author