Earticle

초록

영어

The Chinese, German and South Korean arbitration legal systems have similarities as well as obvious differences. In the fields of enforcing arbitral awards, not only the domestic laws of China, Germany and the Republic of Korea are different, but also the application of New York Convention 1958 in the said three countries differs obviously. Both the Chinese and the Korean arbitration laws have different rules for enforcing the arbitral awards under New York Convention and those foreign arbitral awards not falling under New York Convention, while New York Convention is applied to all foreign arbitral awards according to the German arbitral practice. As to the problems of qualifying and enforcing the “undomestic award” in Article I1，the second sentence, of New York Convention, there are short of rules in China and the decisions of the Chinese courts regarding these problems vary. Hence the PR China should use experiences of the advanced arbitration legislation, including the German and Korean arbitration laws, for reference and improve the Chinese Arbitration law 1995 as soon as possible.

중국어

中德韩三国的仲裁法律制度具有共同点，亦存在明显差异。在仲裁裁决的执行方面，不仅中德韩三国的国内立法存在较大差异，而且三国在适用≪纽约公约≫方面也有明显不同。中国和韩国仲裁法区分公约裁决和非公约裁决，德国仲裁实践对所有外国仲裁裁决一律适用 ≪纽约公约≫。在关于≪纽约公约≫第1条第1款第2项规定的“非内国裁决”的认定和执行问题上，中国缺乏明确的法律规定，司法实践较为混乱。中国应借鉴包括德国和韩国仲裁法在内的先进仲裁立法的立法经验，尽快修改和完善1995年≪中国仲裁法≫。

목차

摘要
 一、序言
 二、仲裁裁决的国籍
 三、承认和执行仲裁裁决的条件
 四、承认和执行仲裁裁决的程序
 五、结论
 Abstract

키워드

저자

• 秦瑞亭 [ 진서정 | 南开大学法学院副教授, 硕士生导师 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  Journal of China Studies

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1975-5902

• eISSN

  3022-5590

• 수록기간

  2006~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 912 DDC 951