Earticle

초록

영어

As globalized, economy has led each country to be concerned about their own patent law issue. As BBS case(Japan), the issue of parallel imports is a matter of interpretation of domestic patent law. Accordingly, principle of patent independence and territoriality are not relevant to the analysis of parallel imports. For example, BBS case(Tokyo high court, Japan) reads each country to be concerned about international exhaustion of right. Therefor each country accepts the doctrine of international exhaustion for their purpose of Patent law. In the beginning, Korean government prohibit the parallel importation of genuine goods to evade unnecessary trade friction and to protect the intellectual property rights. however Korean government accepted the parallel importation of genuine goods partly through amendment of the Customs Service regulations in 1995. The acceptance of the doctrine of international exhaustion will depend on each country’s level of economic development. In this paper, we focus on the meaning and type of exhaustion of patent right. And we will introduce about the scope, requirement, effect, and standard of infringement judgment next time.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
 Ⅱ. 권리소진 의의
  1. 국내소진의 의미
  2. 국제소진의 의미
  3. 실시에 있어서의 소진의미
  4. 소진의 의미에 대한 정리
 Ⅲ. 권리소진에 관한 학설
  1. 특허독립의 원칙
  2. 국제적 권리소진론
  3. 관련 학설
 Ⅳ. 마치며
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

특허독립의 원칙 WTO/TRIPs 협정 속지주의 권리소진원칙 국내소진론 국제소진론 특허제품 특허권소멸 특허침해 병행수입 소유권 이전설 묵시의 실시허락설 거래보장설 이중이득불요설 대가회수설 정당행위설 목적달성설 권리남용설 최초판매이론 principle of the independence of patents first sale doctrine doctrine of patent exhaustion patent infringement patent litigation extinction of patent right patented product(a patented article) territorial principle parallel import execution WTO/TRIPs

저자

• 윤선희 [ Yun, Sun-Hee | 한양대학교 법과대학 교수 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물