Earticle

초록

영어

This article focuses on the issue of compulsory license of pharmaceutical patents. Article 31 of the TRIPS Agreement allows WTO Member countries compulsory licenses of patented inventions in certain special cases such as extreme emergency. Several countries with severe HIV/AIDS problems, such as Thailand and South Africa attempted to use the compulsory licenses of pharmaceutical patents. The U.S. governments, aggressively lobbied by U.S. pharmaceutical firms, gave political pressure on the Thai and South African governments, insisting that those compulsory licenses were violating article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement, which prohibits Member countries from discriminating field of technologies in patenting inventions. However, human rights groups both in and out of the U.S. gave political pressure on the Clinton Administration, managing to win the victory over the U.S. pharmaceutical firms. After failing to limit the use of compulsory licenses of pharmaceutical patents by developing countries, the U.S. pharmaceutical industry has seemed to give up the TRIPS regime, but chose bilateral negotiation to achieve their goals. This article tries to give some suggestions how to deal with the expected U.S. trade pressures when Korea chose to determine compulsory licenses of pharmaceutical patents.

목차

I. 서론
 II. TRIPS 협정 의 강제실시규정과 미국의 대응
  1. TRIPS 협정의 강제설시규정
  2. 강제실시의 시도에 대한 미국의 대응
 III. WTO 에서의 공중보건선언 및 TRIPS 협정 개정안의 채택
  1. 공중보건선언의 채택
  2. TRIPS 협정 개정안의 채택
 IV. TRIPS 협정의 협상 당시 미국의 전략:과거로부터 의 교훈
  1. TRIPS 협정의 협상 당시의 구조
  2. 양자협상과 미국무역 관련법
  3. 다자협상의 장으로서 GATT를 선택
  4. 지적재산권문제를 우루과이라운드에서 채택
  5. 소결
 V. 공중보건선언 및 TRIPS 협정 개정안의 의미: 미국의 전략 변화
 VI. 결론 : 대응방안
 참고문헌
 Abstract

키워드

저자

• 강희갑 [ Kang, Heekap | 명지대학교 법과대학 명예교수, 관동대학교 법학과 초빙 교수, 법학박사. ]
• 박준우 [ Park, Junu | 서강대학교 법학과 부교수, 볍학박사 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  산업재산권 [Journal of Industrial Property]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-6055

• eISSN

  2733-9483

• 수록기간

  1995~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 367 DDC 346