The exercise of subjective rights contributes to the goals of the community in the sense that society makes each individual an advocate of the general interest. Hence, every subjective right must tend towards the goal for which it has been granted. Any exercise of a right that is incompatible with purpose for which it was conferred would amount, under this conception, to a misuse of rights. The immediate effect on copyright law is to secure a fair return for an author's creative labor. But the ultimate aim is, by this incentive, to stimulate artistic creativity for the general public good. The limited scope of the copyright holder's statutory monopoly, like copyright limitation, the limited copyright duration, and compulsory licences required by the copyright law, reflects the balance of competing claims upon the public interest. Copyright licensing agreement or exercise of copyright amounted to misuse of its copyrights, if copyright licensing agreement goes essentially attempts to suppress any attempt by the licensee to independently implement the idea, copyright limitation, and the limited copyright duration which copyright subject matter, and if the copyright was used as leverage to gain competitive advantages over licensees in areas beyond the scope of the limited privileges conferred by the copyright.
목차
I. 서론 II. 저작권 제한규정의 법적성질 1. 강행규정과 임의규정 2. 저작재산권 제한규정의 법적성질 III. 부당한 저작물 이용허락계약의 제한과 그 한계 1. 계약자유의 제한과 그 한계 2. 독점규제법에 의한 제한과 그 한계 IV. 부당한 저작권 이용허락계약의 제한의 필요성 V. 결론 참고문헌 Abstract
키워드
저작권 제한저작권 한계저작물 이용허락저작권 남용부당한 저작권의 행사계약자유의 제한mistaken copyright exerciserestriction of copyrightlimitation of copyrightabuse of copyrightcopyright licensing
본 학회는 지식재산 및 관련 제도(특허, 실용신안, 상표, 디자인, 영업비밀, 저작권, 반도체칩, 컴퓨터프로그램, 데이터베이스, 디지털콘텐츠 등)에 관한 국내외 이론과 실무에 대한 연구를 촉진하여 지식재산분야의 학문간 융합발전과 국제적 유대를 강화하고, 지식재산에 관한 지식을 보급하여 인적 네트워크 구축과 정책제언을 추진하며 이를 통해 국가발전에 이바지하는 것을 목적으로 한다.