Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this article is to find out a way in Korea Copyright Act(KCA) to prevent the possible abuse of the author’s right of integrity. There are two issues that this article tries to solve; first, whether the author’s right of integrity is being abused, and second, what legal solution the court or the legislature can provide. To give answers to the issues, this article first clarifies the legal interest that the right of integrity should protect. This article shows that the author’s right, as Immanuel Kant who first provided the underlying philosophical foundation for author’s right, is the right of an author to communicate his thought to the public, and therefore that it is only when the public is confused about, or misunderstand, the author’s thought that the right of integrity is infringed. This article also shows that the late 19th and early 20th French courts also required the ‘change of the author’s thought’ for the infringement of the right of integrity in the same vein with the theory of Kant. Current French courts also show the same attitude to the infringement of right of integrity, especially with regard to utilitarian works and parody works. This article argues that the KCA provides right of integrity far beyond the extent that is necessary for preventing the public from misunderstanding an author’s thought. This excessive protection raises the transaction costs of utilizing copyrighted works in an unjustifiable way, and turns the exercise of the right into an abuse of the right. To prevent the abuse of the right of integrity, this article argues that anti-trust regulation and the abuse of right theory under the Korea Civil Act have their own limitations. Finally, this article proposes an amendment to the KCA that requires the ‘misunderstanding of the author’s thought’ for the infringement of right of integrity.

목차

I. 서론
 II. 동일성유지권의 보호취지
  1. 칸트의 견해와 프랑스 법원의 저작인격권 인정
  2. 프랑스 법원의 동일성유지권 침해 부인 사례
   가. 기능적저작물
    (1) 응용미술저작물
    (2) 컴퓨터프로그램 및 데이터베이스
    (3) 건축저작물
   나. 2차적저작물의 작성에 동의한 경우
   다. 패러디 등
   라. 공공의 안전 기타 공공의 질서
  3. 소결: 동일성유지권의 기능은 사상 오인의 방지
   가. 패러디 등
   나. 2차적저작물작성권과의 관계
   다. 기능적저작물
   라. 저작물의 원본에 대한 소유권과의 관계
 III. 동일성유지권 남용의 방지 방안
  1. 독점규제법의 적용
  2. 동일성유지권 남용의 항변
  3. 동일성유지권 규정의 개정
 IV. 결론
 【참고문헌】
 

키워드

저작인격권 동일성유지권 아이디어-표현 이분법 남용 독점규제법 2차적저작물 기능적저작물 패러디 건축저작물 moral right right of integrity idea-expression dichotomy abuse of right anti-trust derivative works utilitarian work parody architectural work.

저자

• 박준우 [ Junu Park | 서강대학교 법학전문대학원 교수. ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물