Earticle

현재 위치 Home

디자인 보호제도의 현황과 발전을 위한 제언
A Study on the Present Design Protection System and Suggestion for the Improvement

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국지식재산학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    산업재산권 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제38호 (2012.08)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.131-178
  • 저자
    이상정
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A254982

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

9,700원

원문정보

초록

영어
Design Protection in Korea began from 1908. But how many and what kinds of designs were protected by that Decree is not well known. After World War Ⅱ, we adopted the design-patent system like US. In 1961 sui generis Design Act was legislated and registered designs were protected. In 1987 applied art was exampled as copyrightable work, whereas the 1957 Act only protected the hand-craft. Even though copyright act was revised, the court ruled as before. That is applied art can be protected only in exceptional cases. After the supreme court's judgement Design Act was amended and adopted the Non-Substantive Examination System (NSES). But in 2000 the copyright act was amended and pronounced expressly that design is protected by copyright law on the condition that it can be identified separately from, and are capable of existing independently of the article. In 2004 the shape of article began to be protected by Unfair Competition Prevention Act. There exist 3 main acts to protect the design. This paper studies how those acts apply to the 7 kinds of designs: those are Textile Design, Fashion Design, Type face Design, Editorial Design, Screen Display Design, Package Design, Graphic Character Design. After surveying practices in the KIPO and cases in the courts this paper points out the problems and suggests what to be revised for the improvements. Those are as follows:1) In the area of design protection act, it is more preferable to abolish the dual system and the Non-Substantive Examination System be expanded extensively to cover the all the classes of products. 2) In the area of copyright act, the definition of applied arts must be revised. The definition of U.S. copyright act is a good example. 3) In the area of unfair competition prevention act, the requirements to be protected by that law need to be reconsidered, and that provision should not be the barrier to free competition. In future it is preferable that all acts would be combined into one act and the subject matter and the requirements to be protected by that law must be prescribed expressly.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
 Ⅱ. 디자인보호 관련법
  1. 디자인보호법
  2. 저작권법
  3. 부정경쟁방지법
 Ⅲ. 디자인별 고찰
  1. 직물디자인
  2. 패션디자인
  3. 글자체 디자인
  4. 화상디자인
  5. 편집디자인
  6. 포장 디자인
  7. 시각적 캐릭터 디자인
  8. 정리
 Ⅳ. 문제점 및 제언
  1. 디자인보호법
  2. 저작권법
  3. 부정경쟁방지법
  4. 맺음말
 참고문헌
 

키워드

디자인 응용미술 상품형태 디자인보호법 저작권법 부정경쟁방지법 직물디자인 패션디자인 글자체 디자인 편집디자인 화상디자인 포장디자인 시각적 캐릭터 디자인 Design Applied Arts Shape of Product Design Protection Act Copyright Law Unfair Competition Law Textile Design Fashion Design Type face Design Editorial Design Screen Display Design Package Design Graphic Character Design.

저자

  • 이상정 [ Lee, Sang-Jeong | 경희대학교 법학전문대학원 교수 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국지식재산학회 [Korea Intellectual Property Society]
  • 설립연도
    1967
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    본 학회는 지식재산 및 관련 제도(특허, 실용신안, 상표, 디자인, 영업비밀, 저작권, 반도체칩, 컴퓨터프로그램, 데이터베이스, 디지털콘텐츠 등)에 관한 국내외 이론과 실무에 대한 연구를 촉진하여 지식재산분야의 학문간 융합발전과 국제적 유대를 강화하고, 지식재산에 관한 지식을 보급하여 인적 네트워크 구축과 정책제언을 추진하며 이를 통해 국가발전에 이바지하는 것을 목적으로 한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    산업재산권 [Journal of Industrial Property]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-6055
  • eISSN
    2733-9483
  • 수록기간
    1995~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 367 DDC 346

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 산업재산권 제38호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장