Earticle

초록

영어

This article studies on the Legal adaptation of the term ‘intellectual property’ in East Asia such as Korea, Japan and Chinese. This article also evaluates the corresponding terms and considers the roles they do and adequacy of them. The term "intellectual property" refers to the rights resulting from intellectual activity in the industrial, scientific, literary or artistic fields. The economic and cultural importance of this concept and term are increasing rapidly. Locke's theory that the fruit of his own labour should belong to the individual was extended in the 18th century to intellectual product. Locke's theory had justified to consider intellectual product as property rights. The term has been widespread since establishment of the World “Intellectual Property” Organization (WIPO) in 1967. The debate over whether liability rules or property rules are preferable for intellectual property has extended to the term itself. There are some critics that "Intellectual property" is a misnomer since the right to exclude is the defining characteristic of property and incentives to engage in creative activity are increasingly being granted in the form of liability rights rather than property rights. Some suggests that intellectual liability is more proper term than intellectual property. Instead of the term 'intellectual property', the new term 'knowledge property' has been used in China and South Korea. The term 'intellectual property' is more proper than 'knowledge property' in respect of justify intellectual product as a property because the word 'intellectual' indicate intellectual labour and activity. The term 'intellectual property' has also advantage to include music and arts as subject matter because it indicate intellectual activity. On the other hands the term 'knowledge property' well reflect the importance of knowledge as the term knowledge-based economy. The dynamism and complexity of the term 'intellectual property' has a semantic dimension. The time has comes to consider an accurate term for the legal right for the results of intellectual activity.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 서구에서의 ‘Intellectual property’ 용어의 탄생
  1. ‘Intellectual property’ 용어가 가지는 힘
  2. ‘Intellectual property’ 용어의 형성
  3. 소결
 Ⅲ. 일본에서의 ‘Intellectual property’ 용어의 수용
  1. 용어형성 배경
  2. 工業所有權 용어의 형성 및 변화
  3. ‘無體財産權’, ‘知的所有權’, ‘知的財産權’ 용어의 형성과 변화
  4. ‘知的所有權’이라는 용어의 창작
 Ⅳ. 중국에서의 ‘Intellectual property’ 용어의 수용
  1. 용어형성 배경
  2. ‘智力成果权’, ‘知识产权’ 용어의 형성과 변화
 Ⅴ. 한국에서의 ‘Intellectual property’ 용어의 수용
  1. 용어 형성의 배경
  2. ‘무채재산권’, ‘지적소유권’, ‘지적재산권’, ‘지식재산권’ 용어의 형성과 변화
  3. ‘intellectual property’의 바람직한 한국어 대응 용어 분석
 Ⅵ. 결론
 참고문헌
 

키워드

저자

• 윤권순 [ Yoon, Kwon-Soon | 한국지식재산연구원 연구위원 ] 제1저자
• 이승현 [ Lee Seung-Hyun | 한국지식재산연구원 선임연구원 ] 제2저자
• 윤종민 [ Yoon, Chong-Min | 충북대학교 법학전문대학원 교수 ] 교신저자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  산업재산권 [Journal of Industrial Property]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-6055

• eISSN

  2733-9483

• 수록기간

  1995~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 367 DDC 346