In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court stats that "Granting patent protection to advances that would occur in the ordinary course without real innovation retards progress and may, in the case of patents combining previously known elements, deprive prior inventions of their value or utility" in KSR. The Court worried about the tragedy of anticommons, which makes unefficient use of resources due to too many exclusive rights, by the low level of barrier to patents under CAFC's TSM test which easily allows granting patents to inventors and easily recognizes patent infringement. The requirements for a patent are novelty, nonobviousness and utility in the U.S. The novelty requirement based on the natural rights perspective protects the public from allowing bad patents. The nonobviousness based on the Utilitarian perspective promotes the efficiency and welfare of the public. The U.S. court's view of novelty and nonobviousness deeply stems from the point mentioned above. Historically, the patent requirements evolved from the novelty to the nonobviousness. The case law shows this point:novelty, novelty plus, flash of genius, scrutinize-with-care (synergism), and nonobviousness. The low level of the requirements for patents of post Graham burdens the public under the pro-patent policy by the U.S.Government and the U.S. Courts then the KSR court comes back to the Graham. I argue that the U.S. courts use the nonobviousenss requirement to control the economic efficiency then, the KSR courts try to avoid the tragedy of anticommons by raising the level of obviousness. To do so, I analyze historical developments mentioned in several cases.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 진보성의 기준의 발전 1. Novelty 기준 2. Novelty Plus 기준 3. Flash of Genius 기준 4. Scrutinize-with-Care 기준 5. Non-obviousness 기준 Ⅲ. 진보성 기준의 확립: Graham사건부터 KSR사건까지 1. 3중주: Graham, Calma 및 Adams 2. KSR 사건 Ⅳ. 결론 참고문헌
키워드
신규성진보성반공유의 비극나쁜 특허좋은 특허친특허정책반특허정책천재의 영감상승효과NoveltyNon-obviousnessTragedy of Anticommonsbad patentgood patentKSRGrahamHotchkissnovelty plusFlash of GeniusScrutinize-with-Caresynergismpro-patentanti-patent
본 학회는 지식재산 및 관련 제도(특허, 실용신안, 상표, 디자인, 영업비밀, 저작권, 반도체칩, 컴퓨터프로그램, 데이터베이스, 디지털콘텐츠 등)에 관한 국내외 이론과 실무에 대한 연구를 촉진하여 지식재산분야의 학문간 융합발전과 국제적 유대를 강화하고, 지식재산에 관한 지식을 보급하여 인적 네트워크 구축과 정책제언을 추진하며 이를 통해 국가발전에 이바지하는 것을 목적으로 한다.