The Grantback Clause is one of patent licensing tools by which the licensor of a patent secure his future control of improvement patent. It raises some concerns on the patent misuse and antitrust. I exam the patent misuse issues under patent law and antitrust issues under antitrust law to the grantback clause in licensing agreement. These two issues, patent misuse and antitrust violation should be separated. The patent misuse is not usually regarded as antitrust violation. To be an antitrust violation, some adverse affect to competition or market power should be proved. Any validity concern has not been raised in Korea, the cases and debates in the U.S. have been reviewed. A firm definition of grantback clause is not yet established. Thus, discussions would not clearly define problems and conclusions. The non-exclusive granting back to licensor's use of licensee improvement patents generally are not illegal per se and not objectionable. The exclusive grantbacks, which grant licensor sole rights to licensee improvements by assignment, may be illegal by establishing market control. The accumulation of patent by accumulation of patents of several licensees which provide the original patentee the control of industry would be illegal more seriously.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. grantback의 경제적 효과 Ⅲ. 법적 및 경쟁적 쟁점 Ⅳ. 유효성에 대한 평가 1. 특허법적 쟁점: 특허권의 남용인가 2. 특허권의 집중 3. 경쟁법적 쟁점 4. 우리나라의 경우 Ⅴ. 결론 참고문헌
키워드
개량기술이전조항특허권의 남용공정거래법거래제한독점시도셔먼법클레이튼 법grantback clausepatent misuseantitrust lawrestrain of tradeattempt to monopolySherman ActClayton Act
본 학회는 지식재산 및 관련 제도(특허, 실용신안, 상표, 디자인, 영업비밀, 저작권, 반도체칩, 컴퓨터프로그램, 데이터베이스, 디지털콘텐츠 등)에 관한 국내외 이론과 실무에 대한 연구를 촉진하여 지식재산분야의 학문간 융합발전과 국제적 유대를 강화하고, 지식재산에 관한 지식을 보급하여 인적 네트워크 구축과 정책제언을 추진하며 이를 통해 국가발전에 이바지하는 것을 목적으로 한다.