Earticle

초록

영어

The debate on the right to live in dignity can die for human dignity. The so-called 'dignity' to stop treatment there are still surviving in the controversial center. Recognizes the dignity, including the case of a foreign country. However, a discussion of dignity has several legal questions. Law typically is indisputable is in large part down to whether the limit and medical disposable personal involvement in murder and suicide potenti al for life. Because it means stopping the human dignity of surviving treatment buy it to give up the treatment can be seen that there is no infringement of the right to life requires a careful legal analysis. As such it can be called a conflict that is part of the medical ethics to take care of possible measures of self-determination and dignity buying individual patient. Recent decision of the US Supreme Court, even if the provisions of the law of the surviving treatment interruption was ruled to be possible under the stringent requirements. This can be seen leaving the simple recognition of whether the euthanasia and dignity was in the previous discuss ion is needed requires a discussion on advancing daily objective criteria and procedures. In this paper, we discuss the direction of the saw and present through a review of such cases in the current international situati on and discussed.

목차

국문초록
 I. 서론
 II. 현재의 논의
 III. 미래의 방향성
 IV. 결론
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

존엄사 자연사 연명치료 안락사 말기상태 의료지시서 Death with dignity Natural death Extraordinary treatment Euthanasia Terminal state Living will Advanced directives

저자

• 홍태석 [ Hong, Tae–Seok | 원광대학교 법학전문대학원 부교수, 법학박사 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물