For social workers in modern society, it is unavoidable to encounter commuting accidents. which have a close correlation with the work itself. To safeguard the interests of labors, the International Labor Organization (ILO) and major countries around the world bring the commuting accidents into the compensation system of work-related injury. In 1996, Chinese government issued the Trial Procedures for Industrial Injury Insurance for Enterprise Employees, in which commuting accidents were considered as industrial injuries for the first time. In China’s Regulations on Work Injury Insurance which was revised in 2010, the commuting accidents was defined as “having sustained injuries due to traffic accidents caused not primarily due to their own responsibilities or mass transit, passenger ferry or train accidents.” Thus, the premise to apply the new regulations appropriately is how to identify ‘commuting’. However, as what the Regulation on Industrial Insurance defines, commuting accidents are not supposed to be caused primarily due to the worker’s responsibilities. Obviously, this requirement violates the principle of no-fault compensation as well as the purpose of safeguarding the labors. Meanwhile, as the commuting accidents are restricted within traffic accidents or mass transit, the regulation, to some extent, is against the principle of equality without considering other circumstances of industrial injuries. This article firstly reviews the relative regulations formulated by ILO and its major countries and the evolution situation of China’s legislation in terms of identifying commuting accidents. Then it elaborates the jurisprudential evidence of the identification of commuting accidents. Afterwards, in accordance with the protection standards of international labor and China’s national conditions and the legal ideas to protect labor’s interests, the article brings forward the premise of identifying commuting accidents, which includes the reasonable time, path and purpose. The ending paragraphs present the limits of the current legal system and its future’s improvement for identifying commuting accidents so as to maximize the protection of labor’s interests and improve the legal system. In conclusion, this article suggests the problem and its amendment of the commuting accidents in China.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말 Ⅱ. ILO와 각국의 통근재해에 관한 규정 Ⅲ. 중국 통근재해의 공상 인정 변천 Ⅳ. 중국 통근재해 공상 인정의 법이론 Ⅴ. 중국 통근재해 공상 인정의 요건 Ⅵ. 나오는 말 참고문헌 Abstract
키워드
중국 통근재해공상업무수행업무관련성사회적 위험론생존권 보장론근무 장소주거합리적인 시간합리적인 경로합리적인 목적통근중단통근이탈commuting accidents in ChinaIndustrial Injurythe work-related injurysafeguard the interests of laborsthe reasonable timepath and purpose.
한국비교노동법학회 [The Korea Society of Comparative Labor Law]
설립연도
1997
분야
사회과학>법학
소개
본 학회는 1997. 4. 1 창립되어 노동법 분야를 주로 연구하는 단체이다. 본 단체는 국내법, 외국의 노동법 노사관계등의 인접학문분야, 국제노동법 등을 연구함으로써 현재 국내적으로 연구가 미진한 분야의 하나인 노동법 분야의 이론적 발전과 재정립. 진보적 이론 창안과 법해석을 통한 사회적 공헌을 그 목적으로 하고 있다.
학회 회의의 자격은 교수, 박사학위 소지자의 자격을 갖춘자를 정회원, 기타의 자를 준회원 또는 특별회원으로 한다. 본학회는 1998년 이후 '노동법 논총'이라는 학술지를 발간하고, 매년 봄(5월)과 가을(9월) 정기학회를 2회이상 개최한다. 학회의 회원은 전국적으로 교수, 공공단체, 연구기관, 공인노무사 및 변호사 등의 전문가로 구성되어 있다.