Earticle

현재 위치 Home

《일반논문》

국가긴급권에 관한 연구
A Study on the Nation Emergency Rights

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 바로가기
  • 간행물
    비교법연구 바로가기
  • 통권
    제14권 1호 (2014.04)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.7-34
  • 저자
    백윤철
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A248045

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

6,700원

원문정보

초록

영어
A state of emergency is a governmental declaration that announces that the country is in a state of emergency. This means that the government can suspend and/or change some functions of the executive, the legislative and or the judiciary during this period of time. It alerts citizens to change their normal behaviour and orders government agencies to implement emergency plans. A government can declare a state of emergency during a time of natural or man-made disaster, during a period of civil unrest, or following a declaration of war or situation of international/internal armed conflict. Justitium is its equivalent in Roman law. Material Law a nation's emergency competence has worked out as a means in history to maintain national peace and social order. Such function and values are still valid nowadays, and the basic aim of the law is not defaced. However, there is also a problem that the material law in force now does not reflect the current times. It has been more than 20years since the law was revised. Since the realistic situation has changed so much all the while, it is necessary to revise the law reflecting the real world, wether the system is used frequently or not. Further, articles concerning the material law have many problems within, in the relationship with basic human rights. Constitution in Force now states the material law in article 77. Material law is stated with two categories of extraordinary and precautionary material law. The material law in force now is stated based on constitution. It has been revised 4 times. But the law in force now still has many problems. First, the condition to proclaim the material law is not certain. Second, the president must get consent from the assembly after the proclamation of material law, but it's more effective to get prior consent to control material law. Lastly, the law has possibility to impose excessive restriction on people's fundamental rights. Therefore, the law has to be revised to resolve those problems. It can also be used as a rationale for suspending rights and freedoms, even if those rights and freedoms are guaranteed under the Constitution. Some countries do not have an embedded Constitution such as the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Israel. Legislation covers a state of emergency in these countries. Under the protocol of the ICCPR, rights and freedoms may be suspended during a state of emergency, for example, a government can detain citizens and hold them without trial. All rights that can be derogated from are listed in the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights. Some sources argue that non-derogable rights cannot be suspended. However this theory is contested. Emergency law does and can override non-derogatory rights during a state of emergency.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
 Ⅱ. 각국의 국가긴급권
 Ⅲ. 한국의 국가긴급권
 Ⅳ. 결론
 참고문헌
 Abstract

키워드

헌법 국가긴급권 계엄 계엄법 기본권 Constitution Nation's emergency competence Exercising vigilance Material law Fundamental right

저자

  • 백윤철 [ Baek, Yun-Chul | 대구사이버대학교 교수. 법학박사. ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 [The Institute of Comparative Law and Legal Culture]
  • 설립연도
    2000
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    본 연구소에서는 세계 각국의 새로운 법률제도를 그때그때 입수하여 이를 소개하고 한국 실정에 접목가능성을 연구·분석한다. 아울러 본 연구소는 국내의 각종 학술단체, 연구소, 연구기관과의 교류를 증진함은 물론 외국대학의 연구소와 공동연구를 통해 외국의 법문화와 학풍을 소개함으로써 대외적인 학풍선양에도 기여하게 함을 목적으로 한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    비교법연구 [The Journal of Comparative Law]
  • 간기
    연3회
  • pISSN
    1598-3285
  • 수록기간
    2000~2025
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 비교법연구 제14권 1호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장